The present study evaluated the impact of organic and conventional fungicide treatments compared with untreated samples (no fungicides were used) on the grape berry yeast community of the Montepulciano variety. The yeast dynamics during the spontaneous fermentation using culture-dependent and -independent methods was also evaluated. Results showed a reduction of yeast biodiversity by conventional treatments determining a negative influence on fermenting yeasts in favor of oxidative yeasts such as Aerobasidiumpullulans. Starmerellabacillaris was significantly more present in organic samples (detected by next generation sequencing (NGS)), while Hanseniaspopauvarum was significantly less present in untreated samples (detected by the culture-dependent method). The fermenting yeasts, developed during the spontaneous fermentation, were differently present depending on the fungicide treatments used. Culture-dependent and -independent methods exhibited the same most abundant yeast species during the spontaneous fermentation but a different relative abundance. Differently, the NGS method was able to detect a greater biodiversity (lower abundant species) in comparison with the culture-dependent method. In this regard, the methodologies used gave a different picture of yeast dynamics during the fermentation process. The results indicated that the fungal treatments can influence the yeast community of grapes leading must fermentation and the final composition of wine.

The Influence of Fungicide Treatments on Mycobiota of Grapes and Its Evolution during Fermentation Evaluated by Metagenomic and Culture-Dependent Methods / Agarbati, Alice; Canonico, Laura; Mancabelli, Leonardo; Milani, Christian; Ventura, Marco; Ciani, Maurizio; Comitini, Francesca. - In: MICROORGANISMS. - ISSN 2076-2607. - ELETTRONICO. - 7:5(2019), p. 114. [10.3390/microorganisms7050114]

The Influence of Fungicide Treatments on Mycobiota of Grapes and Its Evolution during Fermentation Evaluated by Metagenomic and Culture-Dependent Methods

Agarbati, Alice;Canonico, Laura;Ciani, Maurizio
;
Comitini, Francesca
2019-01-01

Abstract

The present study evaluated the impact of organic and conventional fungicide treatments compared with untreated samples (no fungicides were used) on the grape berry yeast community of the Montepulciano variety. The yeast dynamics during the spontaneous fermentation using culture-dependent and -independent methods was also evaluated. Results showed a reduction of yeast biodiversity by conventional treatments determining a negative influence on fermenting yeasts in favor of oxidative yeasts such as Aerobasidiumpullulans. Starmerellabacillaris was significantly more present in organic samples (detected by next generation sequencing (NGS)), while Hanseniaspopauvarum was significantly less present in untreated samples (detected by the culture-dependent method). The fermenting yeasts, developed during the spontaneous fermentation, were differently present depending on the fungicide treatments used. Culture-dependent and -independent methods exhibited the same most abundant yeast species during the spontaneous fermentation but a different relative abundance. Differently, the NGS method was able to detect a greater biodiversity (lower abundant species) in comparison with the culture-dependent method. In this regard, the methodologies used gave a different picture of yeast dynamics during the fermentation process. The results indicated that the fungal treatments can influence the yeast community of grapes leading must fermentation and the final composition of wine.
2019
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/267552
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact