Peptides and peptidomimetics are strongly re-emerging as amenable candidates in the development of therapeutic strategies against a plethora of pathologies. In particular, these molecules are extremely suitable to treat diseases in which a major role is played by protein–protein interactions (PPIs). Unlike small organic compounds, peptides display both a high degree of specificity avoiding secondary off-targets effects and a relatively low degree of toxicity. Further advantages are provided by the possibility to easily conjugate peptides to functionalized nanoparticles, so improving their delivery and cellular uptake. In many cases, such molecules need to assume a specific three-dimensional conformation that resembles the bioactive one of the endogenous ligand. To this end, chemical modifications are introduced in the polypeptide chain to constrain it in a well-defined conformation, and to improve the drug-like properties. In this context, a successful strategy for peptide/peptidomimetics design and optimization is to combine different computational approaches ranging from structural bioinformatics to atomistic simulations. Here, we review the computational tools for peptide design, highlighting their main features and differences, and discuss selected protocols, among the large number of methods available, used to assess and improve the stability of the functional folding of the peptides. Finally, we introduce the simulation techniques employed to predict the binding affinity of the designed peptides for their targets.

Bioinformatics and Biosimulations as Toolbox for Peptides and Peptidomimetics Design: Where Are We? / D’Annessa, Ilda; Di Leva, Francesco Saverio; La Teana, Anna; Novellino, Ettore; Limongelli, Vittorio; Di Marino, Daniele. - In: FRONTIERS IN MOLECULAR BIOSCIENCES. - ISSN 2296-889X. - 7:(2020). [10.3389/fmolb.2020.00066]

Bioinformatics and Biosimulations as Toolbox for Peptides and Peptidomimetics Design: Where Are We?

La Teana, Anna;Di Marino, Daniele
2020-01-01

Abstract

Peptides and peptidomimetics are strongly re-emerging as amenable candidates in the development of therapeutic strategies against a plethora of pathologies. In particular, these molecules are extremely suitable to treat diseases in which a major role is played by protein–protein interactions (PPIs). Unlike small organic compounds, peptides display both a high degree of specificity avoiding secondary off-targets effects and a relatively low degree of toxicity. Further advantages are provided by the possibility to easily conjugate peptides to functionalized nanoparticles, so improving their delivery and cellular uptake. In many cases, such molecules need to assume a specific three-dimensional conformation that resembles the bioactive one of the endogenous ligand. To this end, chemical modifications are introduced in the polypeptide chain to constrain it in a well-defined conformation, and to improve the drug-like properties. In this context, a successful strategy for peptide/peptidomimetics design and optimization is to combine different computational approaches ranging from structural bioinformatics to atomistic simulations. Here, we review the computational tools for peptide design, highlighting their main features and differences, and discuss selected protocols, among the large number of methods available, used to assess and improve the stability of the functional folding of the peptides. Finally, we introduce the simulation techniques employed to predict the binding affinity of the designed peptides for their targets.
2020
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
fmolb-07-00066.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza d'uso: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.43 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.43 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/278918
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 22
  • Scopus 33
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 33
social impact