Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to offer a critical analysis of the enablers and barriers that influence the support of Business Intelligence and Analytics (BI&A) to the creation and dissemination of Management Accounting (MA) knowledge within organizations. Design/methodology/approach – A review of 56 articles related to the use of BI&A systems in MA domain has been conducted. Literature has been critically interpreted adopting the lens of Intellectual Capital (IC), and the main findings have been presented and discussed according to the concepts of human, organizational and relational capitals. Findings – The review shows that BI&A adoption in MA contexts depends not on static enablers and barriers but on the dynamic interaction between stocks and flows of IC. Stocks such as skills, managerial support, IT infrastructures and external expertise only sustain BI&A use when continuously renewed through flows of training, collaboration and trust-building. Without such flows, even strong initial conditions deteriorate, leading to stagnation or abandonment of BI&A. Originality/value – This study advances knowledge by reframing BI&A adoption in MA not as the outcome of static enablers and barriers but as a dynamic process shaped by the continuous interaction between stocks and flows of IC. This perspective moves beyond deterministic models and highlights the fragile and evolving nature of BI&A assimilation.

Reframing business intelligence & analytics use for the creation and dissemination of management accounting knowledge: an intellectual capital perspective / Lasca, Walter; Ascani, Ilenia; Ciccola, Roberta; Montemari, Marco. - In: VINE JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. - ISSN 2059-5891. - (2025). [Epub ahead of print] [10.1108/VJIKMS-09-2025-0415]

Reframing business intelligence & analytics use for the creation and dissemination of management accounting knowledge: an intellectual capital perspective

walter lasca;Ilenia Ascani;Roberta Ciccola;Marco Montemari
2025-01-01

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to offer a critical analysis of the enablers and barriers that influence the support of Business Intelligence and Analytics (BI&A) to the creation and dissemination of Management Accounting (MA) knowledge within organizations. Design/methodology/approach – A review of 56 articles related to the use of BI&A systems in MA domain has been conducted. Literature has been critically interpreted adopting the lens of Intellectual Capital (IC), and the main findings have been presented and discussed according to the concepts of human, organizational and relational capitals. Findings – The review shows that BI&A adoption in MA contexts depends not on static enablers and barriers but on the dynamic interaction between stocks and flows of IC. Stocks such as skills, managerial support, IT infrastructures and external expertise only sustain BI&A use when continuously renewed through flows of training, collaboration and trust-building. Without such flows, even strong initial conditions deteriorate, leading to stagnation or abandonment of BI&A. Originality/value – This study advances knowledge by reframing BI&A adoption in MA not as the outcome of static enablers and barriers but as a dynamic process shaped by the continuous interaction between stocks and flows of IC. This perspective moves beyond deterministic models and highlights the fragile and evolving nature of BI&A assimilation.
2025
Business intelligence and analytics; Intellectual capital; Knowledge management; Literature review; Management accounting
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Lasca_Reframing-business-intelligence-analytics_2025.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza d'uso: Creative commons
Dimensione 451.03 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
451.03 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/349872
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact