This national expert-based Delphi-consensus aims at formulating recommendations on the management of dementia care in Italy. This effort seems important and timely given in light of a new scenario arising from a new biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and the availability of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs). Methods: the Steering Committee of the Italian Neurological Society for dementia (SINdem) created appropriate statements. Invited SINdem experts were requested to vote on the statements according to a modified three-round Delphi method. Only those statements reaching Grade A (full agreement ≥ 75%) or B (overall agreement ≥ 80% and full disagreement < 5%) were included in the final document. Round answers’ consistency was graded using the Cohen’s k and within-class correlation coefficient. Results: Forty-six experts voted on 20 statements, which focused on the following aspects: i) organization of care services from early diagnosis to the management of advanced clinical stages; ii) access to biomarkers for a biological diagnosis of AD; iii) requirements necessary for the administration of DMTs; iv) main actors and pathways for the management of patients suffering from cognitive disorders. At the end of the process, 4 statements (20%) received a Grade A consensus, while 16 (80%) reached a Grade B consensus. Although the responses reflect heterogeneity among Italian regions, there was a fair degree of consistency for all statements. Conclusion: The high strength of this expert-based Delphi-consensus may offer guidance for improving the patient’s journey of individuals with cognitive decline from a biological diagnosis to DMTs administration and may possibly offer hints to the Health Systems on dementia

Towards a new Value-based scenario for the management of dementia in Italy: a SINdem delphi consensus study / Marra, Camillo; Beccia, Flavia; Caffarra, Paolo; L'Abbate, Federica; Agosta, Federica; Benussi, Alberto; Bonanni, Laura; Bruni, Amalia C.; Bruno, Giuseppe; Cappa, Stefano F.; Cerami, Chiara; Di Lorenzo, Francesco; Ferrarese, Carlo; Galimberti, Daniela; Guarnieri, Biancamaria; Mariani, Claudio; Nacmias, Benedetta; Pantoni, Leonardo; Piccoli, Tommaso; Perani, Daniela; Rainero, Innocenzo; Tagliavini, Fabrizio; Venneri, Annalena; Boccia, Stefania; Cagnin, Annachiara; Calabrò, Giovanna Elisa; Bozzali, Marco; Null, Null; Angeloni, Rossano; Arabia, Gennarina; Arighi, Andrea; Bagnato, Sergio; Babiloni, Claudio; Baschi, Roberta; Bellelli, Giuseppe; Bessi, Valentina; Canu, Edoardo Domenico Giorgio; Capellari, Sabina; Ceci, Moira; Colao, Rosanna; De Togni, Laura; Della Rocca, Gennaro; Di Giorgi, Lucia; Esposito, Sabrina; Fabi, Katia; Farina, Elisabetta; Filippi, Massimo; Fiori, Chiara; Floris, Gianluca; Forloni, Gianluigi; Giubilei, Franco; Gragnaniello, Daniela; Guarino, Maria; Iavarone, Alessandro; Imperiale, Daniele; Isella, Valeria; Luca, Antonina; Luiselli, Donata; Luzzi, Simona; Malagù, Susanna; Marcon, Michela; Marti, Alessandro; Martorana, Alessandro; Giuseppina Mascia, Maria; Mecocci, Patrizia; Mei, Daniele; Merlo, Paola; Moda, Fabio; Monastero, Roberto; Mura, Giuseppe; Musso, Anna Maria; Orsini, Anna Vittoria Marta; Parchi, Piero; Pardini, Matteo; Parnetti, Lucilla; Plutino, Andrea; Puccio, Gianfranco; Roncacci, Sabina; Rosso, Mara; Rubino, Elisa; Sensi, Stefano; Sibilia, Grazia; Spallazzi, Marco; Sucapane, Patrizia; Tiraboschi, Pietro; Tognoni, Gloria; Tripi, Gabriele; Vacca, Alessandro; Vista, Marco; Zanusso, Gianluigi; Zuffi, Marta. - In: NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES. - ISSN 1590-1874. - STAMPA. - 46:7(2025), pp. 2913-2923. [10.1007/s10072-025-08143-5]

Towards a new Value-based scenario for the management of dementia in Italy: a SINdem delphi consensus study

Luzzi, Simona
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2025-01-01

Abstract

This national expert-based Delphi-consensus aims at formulating recommendations on the management of dementia care in Italy. This effort seems important and timely given in light of a new scenario arising from a new biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and the availability of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs). Methods: the Steering Committee of the Italian Neurological Society for dementia (SINdem) created appropriate statements. Invited SINdem experts were requested to vote on the statements according to a modified three-round Delphi method. Only those statements reaching Grade A (full agreement ≥ 75%) or B (overall agreement ≥ 80% and full disagreement < 5%) were included in the final document. Round answers’ consistency was graded using the Cohen’s k and within-class correlation coefficient. Results: Forty-six experts voted on 20 statements, which focused on the following aspects: i) organization of care services from early diagnosis to the management of advanced clinical stages; ii) access to biomarkers for a biological diagnosis of AD; iii) requirements necessary for the administration of DMTs; iv) main actors and pathways for the management of patients suffering from cognitive disorders. At the end of the process, 4 statements (20%) received a Grade A consensus, while 16 (80%) reached a Grade B consensus. Although the responses reflect heterogeneity among Italian regions, there was a fair degree of consistency for all statements. Conclusion: The high strength of this expert-based Delphi-consensus may offer guidance for improving the patient’s journey of individuals with cognitive decline from a biological diagnosis to DMTs administration and may possibly offer hints to the Health Systems on dementia
2025
Alzheimer care management; Biological diagnosis; Delphi consensus; Dementia; Disease modifying drugs; Italy
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Marra 2025 management dementia.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza d'uso: Creative commons
Dimensione 766.81 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
766.81 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/346632
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact