Background and objectives: End stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are exposed to the risk of ionizing radiation during repeated imaging studies. The variability in diagnostic imaging policies and the accompanying radiation doses across various renal units is still unknown. We studied this variability at the centre level and quantified the associated radiation doses at the patient level. Methods: Fourteen Italian nephrology departments enrolled 739 patients on haemodialysis and 486 kidney transplant patients. The details of the radiological procedures performed over one year were recorded. The effective doses and organ doses of radiation were estimated for each patient using standardized methods to convert exposure parameters into effective and organ doses Results: Computed tomography (CT) was the major contributor (> 77%) to ionizing radiation exposure. Among the haemodialysis and kidney transplant patients, 15% and 6% were in the high (≥ 20 mSv per year) radiation dose groups, respectively. In haemodialysis patients, the most exposed organs were the liver (16 mSv), the kidney (15 mSv) and the stomach (14 mSv), while the uterus (6.2 mSv), the lung (5.7 mSv) and the liver (5.5 mSv) were the most exposed in kidney transplant patients. The average cumulative effective dose (CED) of ionizing radiation among centres in this study was highly variable both in haemodialysis (from 6.4 to 18.8 mSv per patient-year; p = 0.018) and even more so in kidney transplant (from 0.6 to 13.7 mSv per patient-year; p = 0.002) patients. Conclusions: Radiation exposure attributable to medical imaging is high in distinct subgroups of haemodialysis and transplant patients. Furthermore, there is high inter-centre variability in radiation exposure, suggesting that nephrology units have substantially different clinical policies for the application of diagnostic imaging studies.

Radiation dose from medical imaging in end stage renal disease patients: a Nationwide Italian Survey / Postorino, Maurizio; Lizio, Domenico; De Mauri, Andreana; Marino, Carmela; Tripepi, Giovanni Luigi; Zoccali, Carmine; Brambilla, Marco; MIRA-ESRD Study, Investigators; Balestra, Emilio; Bellino, Diego; Benevento, Roberta; Bregant, Cristina; Bregant, Paola; Cannillo, Barbara; Casto, Giuseppe; Chiarinotti, Doriana; Cimolai, Sara; Colussi, Giacomo; De Agostini, Antonio; Declich, Fausto; Facchini, Maria Grazia; Galione, Maria Alessandra; Gavotti, Cesare; Gerini, Ugo; Isoardi, Paola; Izzo, Cristina; Levrero, Fabrizio; Lorenzon, Eric; Maffei, Stefano; Maggi, Stefania; Mari, Alberto; Mattana, Federico; Menegotto, Alberto; Meniconi, Ophelia; Paruccini, Nicoletta; Pierotti, Luisa; Pieruzzi, Federico; Pontoriero, Giuseppe; Postorino, Adele; Quaglia, Marco; Rampado, Osvaldo; Ranghino, Andrea; Reccanello, Sonia; Sabatino, Stefania; Sangalli, Giulia; Sottocornola, Chiara; Sutto, Marina; Tata, Salvatore; Torresin, Alberto; Traino, Antonio; Trianni, Annalisa; Zeni, Letizia. - In: JN. JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY. - ISSN 1121-8428. - 34:(2021), pp. 791-799. [10.1007/s40620-020-00911-0]

Radiation dose from medical imaging in end stage renal disease patients: a Nationwide Italian Survey

Balestra, Emilio
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Maggi, Stefania
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Mari, Alberto
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Ranghino, Andrea
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Background and objectives: End stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are exposed to the risk of ionizing radiation during repeated imaging studies. The variability in diagnostic imaging policies and the accompanying radiation doses across various renal units is still unknown. We studied this variability at the centre level and quantified the associated radiation doses at the patient level. Methods: Fourteen Italian nephrology departments enrolled 739 patients on haemodialysis and 486 kidney transplant patients. The details of the radiological procedures performed over one year were recorded. The effective doses and organ doses of radiation were estimated for each patient using standardized methods to convert exposure parameters into effective and organ doses Results: Computed tomography (CT) was the major contributor (> 77%) to ionizing radiation exposure. Among the haemodialysis and kidney transplant patients, 15% and 6% were in the high (≥ 20 mSv per year) radiation dose groups, respectively. In haemodialysis patients, the most exposed organs were the liver (16 mSv), the kidney (15 mSv) and the stomach (14 mSv), while the uterus (6.2 mSv), the lung (5.7 mSv) and the liver (5.5 mSv) were the most exposed in kidney transplant patients. The average cumulative effective dose (CED) of ionizing radiation among centres in this study was highly variable both in haemodialysis (from 6.4 to 18.8 mSv per patient-year; p = 0.018) and even more so in kidney transplant (from 0.6 to 13.7 mSv per patient-year; p = 0.002) patients. Conclusions: Radiation exposure attributable to medical imaging is high in distinct subgroups of haemodialysis and transplant patients. Furthermore, there is high inter-centre variability in radiation exposure, suggesting that nephrology units have substantially different clinical policies for the application of diagnostic imaging studies.
2021
Cancer; Haemodialysis; Kidney transplantation; Radiation dosimetry
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Pastorino_Radiation-dose-from-medical-imaging_2023.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Radiation dose from medical imaging in end stage renal disease patients: a Nationwide Italian Survey
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza d'uso: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 688.32 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
688.32 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/345400
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact