Italy’s long-term care (LTC) system has been caracterised by enduring institutional inertia, remaining virtually unchanged since 1990 – a situation without parallel in the European context. Even the Covid-19 pandemic, which prompted reform efforts in LTC systems across other European countries, failed to bring about significant change in Italy. Although the pandemic highlighted the system’s weaknesses and led to the introduction of a legislative reform tied to the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (PNRR), this reform was never implemented. Various explanations have been offered for the persistent inertia in this policy sector. This article contributes to the discussion by examining the most recent LTC system reform and interpreting it as a case of policy inaction. Through this analysis, the article identifies the system’s prolonged stagnation as the outcome of several interconnected factors: the absence of a meaningful public debate, the influence of social stakeholders, competition between ministries, and the lack of strong political incentives to pursue reform.

Policy inaction. L’inerzia delle politiche LTC in Italia e le sue ragioni / Ranci, C.; Arlotti, M.; Garavaglia, E.. - In: POLITICHE SOCIALI. - ISSN 2284-2098. - 3(2024), pp. 531-552. [10.7389/116170]

Policy inaction. L’inerzia delle politiche LTC in Italia e le sue ragioni

Arlotti M.;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Italy’s long-term care (LTC) system has been caracterised by enduring institutional inertia, remaining virtually unchanged since 1990 – a situation without parallel in the European context. Even the Covid-19 pandemic, which prompted reform efforts in LTC systems across other European countries, failed to bring about significant change in Italy. Although the pandemic highlighted the system’s weaknesses and led to the introduction of a legislative reform tied to the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (PNRR), this reform was never implemented. Various explanations have been offered for the persistent inertia in this policy sector. This article contributes to the discussion by examining the most recent LTC system reform and interpreting it as a case of policy inaction. Through this analysis, the article identifies the system’s prolonged stagnation as the outcome of several interconnected factors: the absence of a meaningful public debate, the influence of social stakeholders, competition between ministries, and the lack of strong political incentives to pursue reform.
2024
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ranci_Policy-inaction_VoR_2024.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: articolo
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza d'uso: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 621.31 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
621.31 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Articolo_polsoc_ULTIMA+VERSIONE.pdf

embargo fino al 30/06/2026

Tipologia: Documento in post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza d'uso: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 408.61 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
408.61 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/341953
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact