Design: We present a quantitative systematic review on the debate about the “stepping stone vs. dead end” hypothesis related to the causal effect of temporary jobs on future labour market performances. Purpose: We aim to investigate the heterogeneous results about the impact of temporary jobs on subsequent labour market performances and to provide policy-makers with further information on the effects of temporary contracts under particular circumstances. Findings: Among 78 observations from 64 articles, 32% support the hypothesis according to which temporary contracts are a port of entry into stable employment positions, 23% report ambiguous or mixed findings, and the remaining 45% provide evidence in favor of the dead end hypothesis. The results from meta-regressions suggest that the stepping stone effect is more likely to emerge when self-selectivity issues are dealt with. The studies focusing on temporary work agency jobs and casual/seasonal jobs support more easily the dead end hypothesis. Finally, in more recent years and when the unemployment rate is larger, the dead end hypothesis is more likely to prevail. Originality: Although many studies have been published on this issue, to the best of our knowledge there are no recent analytic economic surveys on the “stepping stone vs. dead end” debate. The main contribution of our article is to fill this gap.

Are temporary jobs stepping stones or dead ends? A meta-analytical review of the literature / Picchio, Matteo; Filomena, Mattia. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANPOWER. - ISSN 0143-7720. - ELETTRONICO. - 43:9(2022), pp. 60-74. [10.1108/IJM-02-2022-0064]

Are temporary jobs stepping stones or dead ends? A meta-analytical review of the literature

Matteo Picchio
Secondo
;
Mattia Filomena
Primo
2022-01-01

Abstract

Design: We present a quantitative systematic review on the debate about the “stepping stone vs. dead end” hypothesis related to the causal effect of temporary jobs on future labour market performances. Purpose: We aim to investigate the heterogeneous results about the impact of temporary jobs on subsequent labour market performances and to provide policy-makers with further information on the effects of temporary contracts under particular circumstances. Findings: Among 78 observations from 64 articles, 32% support the hypothesis according to which temporary contracts are a port of entry into stable employment positions, 23% report ambiguous or mixed findings, and the remaining 45% provide evidence in favor of the dead end hypothesis. The results from meta-regressions suggest that the stepping stone effect is more likely to emerge when self-selectivity issues are dealt with. The studies focusing on temporary work agency jobs and casual/seasonal jobs support more easily the dead end hypothesis. Finally, in more recent years and when the unemployment rate is larger, the dead end hypothesis is more likely to prevail. Originality: Although many studies have been published on this issue, to the best of our knowledge there are no recent analytic economic surveys on the “stepping stone vs. dead end” debate. The main contribution of our article is to fill this gap.
2022
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/290252
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact