Conventional breeding programmes on common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) are based on knowledge of relationships between forage yield components and economically important characteristics. To improve this knowledge, a small‐plot trial was carried out in 2005 and 2006 at Rimski Šančevi, Serbia, with fourteen common vetch accessions from the Novi Sad Vicia collection of diverse geographic origin and collection status. Results showed significant variability in forage yield components and related characteristics. Two‐year average values of forage dry matter (DM) yield ranged from 8·0 t ha−1 (cvs. Armantes and Labari) to 10·2 t ha−1 (cv. Slavej). The highest 2‐year average concentration of crude protein (CP) was for cv. Armantes (239 g kg−1 DM). Highly significant positive genetic correlation coefficients were found between time from sowing to first flowering and main stem length (0·938) and between number of stems per plant and CP content in the forage DM (0·910). Significant positive phenotypic correlation coefficients were detected between main stem length and time from sowing to first flowering (0·830). A cluster analysis showed four main groups of cultivars based on the recorded forage yield components and related characteristics. It is concluded that common vetch represents a stable and reliable source of protein‐rich forage for regions such as the Balkans area of SE Europe. Genetic variability within common vetch and knowledge of the tested cultivars offer a basis for further improvement and developing novel cultivars.

Forage yield components and classification of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) cultivars of diverse geographic origin / Mikić, A.; Mihailović, V.; Ćupina, B.; Milić, D.; Katić, S.; Karagić, Đ.; Pataki, I.; D'Ottavio, P.; Kraljević-Balalić, M.. - In: GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE. - ISSN 0142-5242. - STAMPA. - 69:(2014), pp. 315-322. [10.1111/gfs.12033]

Forage yield components and classification of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) cultivars of diverse geographic origin

D'Ottavio P.;
2014-01-01

Abstract

Conventional breeding programmes on common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) are based on knowledge of relationships between forage yield components and economically important characteristics. To improve this knowledge, a small‐plot trial was carried out in 2005 and 2006 at Rimski Šančevi, Serbia, with fourteen common vetch accessions from the Novi Sad Vicia collection of diverse geographic origin and collection status. Results showed significant variability in forage yield components and related characteristics. Two‐year average values of forage dry matter (DM) yield ranged from 8·0 t ha−1 (cvs. Armantes and Labari) to 10·2 t ha−1 (cv. Slavej). The highest 2‐year average concentration of crude protein (CP) was for cv. Armantes (239 g kg−1 DM). Highly significant positive genetic correlation coefficients were found between time from sowing to first flowering and main stem length (0·938) and between number of stems per plant and CP content in the forage DM (0·910). Significant positive phenotypic correlation coefficients were detected between main stem length and time from sowing to first flowering (0·830). A cluster analysis showed four main groups of cultivars based on the recorded forage yield components and related characteristics. It is concluded that common vetch represents a stable and reliable source of protein‐rich forage for regions such as the Balkans area of SE Europe. Genetic variability within common vetch and knowledge of the tested cultivars offer a basis for further improvement and developing novel cultivars.
2014
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/87402
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact