OBJECTIVE: To develop a Bayesian belief network (BBN) for Gleason grading of prostate adenocarcinoma. STUDY DESIGN: A shallow network was developed for Gleason grading with open-tree topology, with a root node containing 5 subjective diagnostic alternatives and 8 first-level descendant nodes for diagnostic features. Features or diagnostic clues of the descendant nodes were based on architecture of Gleason patterns. Data collected on 20 slides in the first and third slide circulations in the U.K.-based investigation of observer reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic biopsies were used. Circulations were called A and B. Level of agreement was studied using kappa statistics. RESULTS: Mean of percentage agreements between subjective Gleason major pattern attributed to slides by pathologists and subjective Gleason major pattern most frequently assigned to each slide was 85% in A and 88% in B. Mean of percentage agreements between BBN reading for slides read by pathologists and BBN reading most frequently seen in each slide was 77% in A and 70% in B. CONCLUSION: The BBN for Gleason grading is readily implemented, allowing use of linguistic variables and descriptive terms and accumulation of evidence presented by morphologic clues. This diagnostic decision support system has potential in pathology education.

Bayesian belief network for the Gleason patterns in prostatic adenocarcinoma: development of a diagnostic decision support system for educational purposes / Montironi, Rodolfo; Ball, R. Y.; Griffiths, D. F.; Grigor, K.; Harnden, P. M.; Jarmulowicz, M.; Mcwilliam, L. J.; Moseley, R. P.; Parkinson, M. C.; Santinelli, Alfredo; Moss, S. M.; Melia, J. W.. - In: ANALYTICAL AND QUANTITATIVE CYTOLOGY AND HISTOLOGY. - ISSN 0884-6812. - 30:(2008), pp. 8-15.

Bayesian belief network for the Gleason patterns in prostatic adenocarcinoma: development of a diagnostic decision support system for educational purposes.

MONTIRONI, RODOLFO;SANTINELLI, ALFREDO;
2008-01-01

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a Bayesian belief network (BBN) for Gleason grading of prostate adenocarcinoma. STUDY DESIGN: A shallow network was developed for Gleason grading with open-tree topology, with a root node containing 5 subjective diagnostic alternatives and 8 first-level descendant nodes for diagnostic features. Features or diagnostic clues of the descendant nodes were based on architecture of Gleason patterns. Data collected on 20 slides in the first and third slide circulations in the U.K.-based investigation of observer reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic biopsies were used. Circulations were called A and B. Level of agreement was studied using kappa statistics. RESULTS: Mean of percentage agreements between subjective Gleason major pattern attributed to slides by pathologists and subjective Gleason major pattern most frequently assigned to each slide was 85% in A and 88% in B. Mean of percentage agreements between BBN reading for slides read by pathologists and BBN reading most frequently seen in each slide was 77% in A and 70% in B. CONCLUSION: The BBN for Gleason grading is readily implemented, allowing use of linguistic variables and descriptive terms and accumulation of evidence presented by morphologic clues. This diagnostic decision support system has potential in pathology education.
2008
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/56869
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact