In the presentwork, dynamic tests have been performed on AISI 1018CRsteel specimens by means of a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB). The standardSHPBarrangement has been modified in order to allowrunning tensile tests avoiding spurious and misleading effects due towave dispersion, specimen inertia and mechanical impedance mismatch in the clamping region.However, engineering stress–strain curves obtained from experimental tests are far from representing true material properties because of several phenomena that must be taken into account: the strain rate is not constant during the test, the specimen undergoes remarkable necking, so stress and strain distributions are largely non-uniform, and the temperature increases because of plastic work. Experimental data have been post-processed using a finite element-based optimization procedure where the specimen dynamic deformation is reproduced. Optimal sets of material constants for different constitutive models (Johnson–Cook, Zerilli–Armstrong and others) have been computed by fitting, in a least mean square sense, the numerical and experimental load–displacement curves.
Material Characterization at High Strain Rate by Hopkinson Bar Tests and Finite Element Optimization / Sasso, Marco; G., Newaz; Amodio, Dario. - In: MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING A-STRUCTURAL MATERIALS PROPERTIES MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROCESSING. - ISSN 0921-5093. - 487:(2008), pp. 289-300.
Material Characterization at High Strain Rate by Hopkinson Bar Tests and Finite Element Optimization
SASSO, Marco;AMODIO, Dario
2008-01-01
Abstract
In the presentwork, dynamic tests have been performed on AISI 1018CRsteel specimens by means of a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB). The standardSHPBarrangement has been modified in order to allowrunning tensile tests avoiding spurious and misleading effects due towave dispersion, specimen inertia and mechanical impedance mismatch in the clamping region.However, engineering stress–strain curves obtained from experimental tests are far from representing true material properties because of several phenomena that must be taken into account: the strain rate is not constant during the test, the specimen undergoes remarkable necking, so stress and strain distributions are largely non-uniform, and the temperature increases because of plastic work. Experimental data have been post-processed using a finite element-based optimization procedure where the specimen dynamic deformation is reproduced. Optimal sets of material constants for different constitutive models (Johnson–Cook, Zerilli–Armstrong and others) have been computed by fitting, in a least mean square sense, the numerical and experimental load–displacement curves.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.