Mixed cotton–polyester textile waste remains difficult to recycle because processes that recover synthetic polymers often leave the cotton fraction underused, while cellulose extraction methods may compromise the polyester component. This study investigates whether cotton in such blends can be converted into high-quality microcrystalline cellulose while retaining the potential value of the recovered polyester fraction. Cotton waste and cotton–polyester blends were treated using aqueous sulfuric acid at different conditions: from 15 to 20% acid concentration and from 70 to 80 °C for five to ten hours. The recovered microcrystalline cellulose was characterised and compared to commercial microcrystalline cellulose, while the polyester fraction was assessed using tensile testing. Enzymatic hydrolysis and a dimethyl sulfoxide co-solvent approach were evaluated as alternatives. The aqueous acid process yielded 82 to 97% microcrystalline cellulose from cotton waste and up to 51% from blended waste. The recovered cellulose showed around 10% higher crystallinity than commercial material and a similar particle size distribution, although morphology depended on the feedstock. The polyester fraction showed only minor reductions in tensile performance. The novelty of this study lies in the demonstration of a simple, ionic-liquid-free, single-reagent route that valorises both material streams from cotton–polyester textile waste.

Microcrystalline Cellulose Extraction in Blended Textile Waste with Preliminary Evaluation of Polyester Integrity / Jbr, R., Ipsmiller, W., Czerwinska, N., Sabbatini, S., Giosue', C., Kählig, P., Ruello, M.L., Corinaldesi, V., Bartl, A., Di Maggio, R.. - In: APPLIED SCIENCES. - ISSN 2076-3417. - 16:13(2026). [10.3390/app16136643]

Microcrystalline Cellulose Extraction in Blended Textile Waste with Preliminary Evaluation of Polyester Integrity

Jbr, Rida
Primo
;
Czerwinska, Natalia;Sabbatini, Simona;Giosue', Chiara
;
Ruello, Maria Letizia;Corinaldesi, Valeria;Bartl, Andreas;
2026-01-01

Abstract

Mixed cotton–polyester textile waste remains difficult to recycle because processes that recover synthetic polymers often leave the cotton fraction underused, while cellulose extraction methods may compromise the polyester component. This study investigates whether cotton in such blends can be converted into high-quality microcrystalline cellulose while retaining the potential value of the recovered polyester fraction. Cotton waste and cotton–polyester blends were treated using aqueous sulfuric acid at different conditions: from 15 to 20% acid concentration and from 70 to 80 °C for five to ten hours. The recovered microcrystalline cellulose was characterised and compared to commercial microcrystalline cellulose, while the polyester fraction was assessed using tensile testing. Enzymatic hydrolysis and a dimethyl sulfoxide co-solvent approach were evaluated as alternatives. The aqueous acid process yielded 82 to 97% microcrystalline cellulose from cotton waste and up to 51% from blended waste. The recovered cellulose showed around 10% higher crystallinity than commercial material and a similar particle size distribution, although morphology depended on the feedstock. The polyester fraction showed only minor reductions in tensile performance. The novelty of this study lies in the demonstration of a simple, ionic-liquid-free, single-reagent route that valorises both material streams from cotton–polyester textile waste.
2026
blend; cotton; microcrystalline cellulose
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Jbr_Microcrystalline-Cellulose-Extraction-Blended_2026.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza d'uso: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.88 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.88 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/360332
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact