An accurate classification and mechanical characterization of historic masonry is essential for the structural assessment and safety of heritage buildings. The Italian Building Code (IBC) classifies eight recurring masonry typologies and provides reference ranges for their mechanical parameters. However, due to the heterogeneity of materials and techniques, this classification may not fully capture local specificities; therefore, the IBC recommends regional investigations to refine these references and improve the reliability of local assessments. This work collects and analyzes an extensive database of in-situ experimental tests (flat-jacks and shear tests), performed by licensed laboratories in the Marche Region, comprising over 400 tests organized by masonry typology, mechanical parameter, and location. Distributional and quartile-based analyses are used to identify local reference ranges and to support comparisons with national provisions. Results highlight the frequent occurrence of a mixed stone-and-brick typology, not included in the IBC, whose characterization contributes to filling this gap. Discrepancies are observed between regional and national ranges, especially for brick masonry compressive strength, while the elastic modulus shows wide dispersion across typologies. The limited number of shear tests allows only a preliminary comparison, calling for further experimental evidence. Future developments will focus on expanding the database and enabling collaborative data sharing.

Historic Masonry in Italy Between Experimental Evidence and National Standards: Insights from the Marche Region / Romano, G., Pace, G., Quagliarini, E.. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE. - ISSN 1558-3058. - (2026). [Epub ahead of print] [10.1080/15583058.2026.2643700]

Historic Masonry in Italy Between Experimental Evidence and National Standards: Insights from the Marche Region

Romano, Guido
Primo
;
Pace, Giuseppe;Quagliarini, Enrico
Ultimo
2026-01-01

Abstract

An accurate classification and mechanical characterization of historic masonry is essential for the structural assessment and safety of heritage buildings. The Italian Building Code (IBC) classifies eight recurring masonry typologies and provides reference ranges for their mechanical parameters. However, due to the heterogeneity of materials and techniques, this classification may not fully capture local specificities; therefore, the IBC recommends regional investigations to refine these references and improve the reliability of local assessments. This work collects and analyzes an extensive database of in-situ experimental tests (flat-jacks and shear tests), performed by licensed laboratories in the Marche Region, comprising over 400 tests organized by masonry typology, mechanical parameter, and location. Distributional and quartile-based analyses are used to identify local reference ranges and to support comparisons with national provisions. Results highlight the frequent occurrence of a mixed stone-and-brick typology, not included in the IBC, whose characterization contributes to filling this gap. Discrepancies are observed between regional and national ranges, especially for brick masonry compressive strength, while the elastic modulus shows wide dispersion across typologies. The limited number of shear tests allows only a preliminary comparison, calling for further experimental evidence. Future developments will focus on expanding the database and enabling collaborative data sharing.
2026
Diagonal test; flat-jack test; historic masonry; in-situ tests; masonry database; mechanical characteristics
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Romano_Historic-Masonry-Italy-Between_2026.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza d'uso: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 7.03 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
7.03 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/358632
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact