Organizations are increasingly committed to reducing their environmental footprints, a process fraught with the complex challenge of identifying and mitigating unique environmental impacts and hotspots without merely shifting burdens elsewhere. This study applies Organizational Life Cycle Assessment (OLCA) methodology using ISO 14040/14044 and ISO/TS 14072 guidance, mapped gate-to-gate flows for the firm's entire 2023 output. Inputs and emissions were compiled on-site and modelled in SimaPro 9.1.1 with the Ecoinvent 3.3 “allocation, cut-off” database, applying ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) across 18 impact categories. The results show that electricity use is the main environmental hotspot, contributing 43.5 % to total climate impacts, while cotton fibre accounts for 87.3 % of freshwater eutrophication and 37.8 % of water consumption; combined measures on renewable electricity and recycled fibres could reduce the organisation's overall climate footprint by up to 34.6 %. To address these impacts, the adoption of renewable energy sources like solar energy systems to reduce electricity consumption is recommended. This analysis pinpoints concise improvements: transition to renewable electricity, favour green suppliers of water-efficient cotton and recycled polyester and replace brass with different materials. The analysis conducted aims to be transferable to peer fashion companies in Italy and beyond, favouring the spread of Life Cycle based methodologies.

Organizational Life Cycle Assessment: A Case Study in the Fashion industry Small and Medium Enterprises / Ahmed, Salik; Liscio, Marco Ciro; Sospiro, Paolo; Voukkali, Irene; Zorpas, Antonis A.. - In: CASE STUDIES IN CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. - ISSN 2666-0164. - 13:(2025). [10.1016/j.cscee.2025.101313]

Organizational Life Cycle Assessment: A Case Study in the Fashion industry Small and Medium Enterprises

Liscio, Marco Ciro
;
Sospiro, Paolo;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Organizations are increasingly committed to reducing their environmental footprints, a process fraught with the complex challenge of identifying and mitigating unique environmental impacts and hotspots without merely shifting burdens elsewhere. This study applies Organizational Life Cycle Assessment (OLCA) methodology using ISO 14040/14044 and ISO/TS 14072 guidance, mapped gate-to-gate flows for the firm's entire 2023 output. Inputs and emissions were compiled on-site and modelled in SimaPro 9.1.1 with the Ecoinvent 3.3 “allocation, cut-off” database, applying ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) across 18 impact categories. The results show that electricity use is the main environmental hotspot, contributing 43.5 % to total climate impacts, while cotton fibre accounts for 87.3 % of freshwater eutrophication and 37.8 % of water consumption; combined measures on renewable electricity and recycled fibres could reduce the organisation's overall climate footprint by up to 34.6 %. To address these impacts, the adoption of renewable energy sources like solar energy systems to reduce electricity consumption is recommended. This analysis pinpoints concise improvements: transition to renewable electricity, favour green suppliers of water-efficient cotton and recycled polyester and replace brass with different materials. The analysis conducted aims to be transferable to peer fashion companies in Italy and beyond, favouring the spread of Life Cycle based methodologies.
2025
Circular economy; Environmental impact assessment; OLCA; Small medium enterprises; Sustainability; Textile
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ahmed_Organizational-life-cycle_VoR_2025.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza d'uso: Creative commons
Dimensione 3 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/351212
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact