Introduction: We evaluated the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of eptinezumab in preventing high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) and chronic migraine (CM) over 24 weeks in real-world. We also assessed its impact during the first treatment week, in patients failing monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP mAbs), and the effects of dose escalation to 300 mg in patients requiring enhanced control. Methods: EMBRACE II is a multicenter (n = 22), prospective, 24-week, real-world study involving consecutive patients with HFEM or CM who had failed > 3 preventive treatments. Eptinezumab (100 mg, with the option for escalation to 300 mg at week 12) was administered quarterly. Primary endpoint: change in monthly migraine days (MMD), for HFEM or monthly headache days (MHD), for CM, between weeks 21–24 and baseline. Secondary endpoints: changes in monthly analgesic intake (MAI), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS), Migraine Interictal Burden Scale (MIBS-4), and responder rates. Results: Of the 215 participants who had received ≥ 1 eptinezumab dose, 74 were treated for ≥ 24 weeks and considered for effectiveness analysis. Eptinezumab significantly (p < 0.001) reduced MMD/MHD (− 10.5), MAI (− 15.6), NRS (− 2.2), HIT-6 (− 9.9), MIDAS (− 48.7), and MIBS-4 (− 4.3). ≥ 50% responders were 69%, ≥ 75% responders 39.2%, and 100% responders 4.1%. Comparing the first week with the last baseline week, a significant reduction in migraine days was observed (− 3.7; p < 0.001). Significant improvements were seen in patients failing anti-CGRP mAbs (32.4%) and in those escalating to 300 mg (33.8%). Half of the subjects reported being “very much improved” or “much improved”. The adverse events were infrequent (2.8%). Conclusions: This real-world study documents that 24-week eptinezumab treatment is rapidly effective and well tolerated in migraine patients with multiple therapeutic failures (including anti-CGRP mAbs). One-third of patients escalated to 300 mg at week 12, achieving further significant migraine-related disability reduction.

A 24‑week prospective, multicenter, real‑world study on eptinezumab’s effectiveness and safety in migraine prevention (EMBRACE II) / Barbanti, Piero; Aurilia, Cinzia; Egeo, Gabriella; Doretti, Alberto; D'Onofrio, Florindo; Scatena, Paola; Rinalduzzi, Steno; Vinciguerra, Luisa; Sansone, Mattia; Vecchio, Rosario; Drago, Valeria; Viticchi, Giovanna; Bartolini, Marco; Ranieri, Angelo; Bandettini Di Poggio, Monica; Baldisseri, Francesco; Mascarella, Davide; Brusaferri, Fabio; Caputi, Luigi; Messina, Stefano; Autunno, Massimo; Valenza, Alessandro; Orlando, Bianca; Distefano, Marisa; Borrello, Laura; Pistoia, Francesca; Camarda, Cecilia; Saporito, Gennaro; Querzola, Giacomo; Torelli, Paola; Salerno, Antonio; Gragnani, Francesca; Petolicchio, Barbara; Carnevale, Antonio; Messina, Roberta; Filippi, Massimo; Tavani, Sofia; Fiorentini, Giulia; Bonassi, Stefano; Cevoli, Sabina; Mannocci, Alice; Migraine Registry (I-GRAINE) study group, Italian. - In: JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY. - ISSN 0340-5354. - ELETTRONICO. - 272:(2025). [10.1007/s00415-025-13095-z]

A 24‑week prospective, multicenter, real‑world study on eptinezumab’s effectiveness and safety in migraine prevention (EMBRACE II)

Giovanna Viticchi;Marco Bartolini;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Introduction: We evaluated the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of eptinezumab in preventing high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) and chronic migraine (CM) over 24 weeks in real-world. We also assessed its impact during the first treatment week, in patients failing monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP mAbs), and the effects of dose escalation to 300 mg in patients requiring enhanced control. Methods: EMBRACE II is a multicenter (n = 22), prospective, 24-week, real-world study involving consecutive patients with HFEM or CM who had failed > 3 preventive treatments. Eptinezumab (100 mg, with the option for escalation to 300 mg at week 12) was administered quarterly. Primary endpoint: change in monthly migraine days (MMD), for HFEM or monthly headache days (MHD), for CM, between weeks 21–24 and baseline. Secondary endpoints: changes in monthly analgesic intake (MAI), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS), Migraine Interictal Burden Scale (MIBS-4), and responder rates. Results: Of the 215 participants who had received ≥ 1 eptinezumab dose, 74 were treated for ≥ 24 weeks and considered for effectiveness analysis. Eptinezumab significantly (p < 0.001) reduced MMD/MHD (− 10.5), MAI (− 15.6), NRS (− 2.2), HIT-6 (− 9.9), MIDAS (− 48.7), and MIBS-4 (− 4.3). ≥ 50% responders were 69%, ≥ 75% responders 39.2%, and 100% responders 4.1%. Comparing the first week with the last baseline week, a significant reduction in migraine days was observed (− 3.7; p < 0.001). Significant improvements were seen in patients failing anti-CGRP mAbs (32.4%) and in those escalating to 300 mg (33.8%). Half of the subjects reported being “very much improved” or “much improved”. The adverse events were infrequent (2.8%). Conclusions: This real-world study documents that 24-week eptinezumab treatment is rapidly effective and well tolerated in migraine patients with multiple therapeutic failures (including anti-CGRP mAbs). One-third of patients escalated to 300 mg at week 12, achieving further significant migraine-related disability reduction.
2025
CGRP; Disability; Eptinezumab; Migraine; Real-world; Treatment
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Barbanti_24‑week-prospective-multicenter-real‑world_2025.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza d'uso: Creative commons
Dimensione 988.67 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
988.67 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/350817
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact