Synthetic cannabinoids (SC) target the human cannabinoid receptor 1 (hCB1) and are extensively metabolized, but the metabolite activity on the hCB1 receptor after a SC intake is largely unknown. In this study we compared the in vitro hCB1 receptor activity of 26 metabolites of the synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRA) JWH-018, AM-2201, THJ-018 and THJ-2201 as a model system for SC metabolite activity to elucidate their structure-activity relationships. The efficacy and potency of metabolites were assessed using an AequoScreen hCB1 receptor assay in triplicates and 7–8 concentration points (20 µg/mL–9.5 ng/mL) were used to construct dose-response curves and to determine EC50 and Emax. In silico docking and molecular dynamics were performed using a model of the active form of the hCB1 receptor with all the metabolites. Final poses were simulated to assess stability under physiological conditions. We showed that carboxylic acid metabolites and 2-hydroxyindole biotransformational products were inactive, while 5-hydroxypentyl SCRA metabolites decreased efficacy to <70%, qualifying them as partial agonists. Eighteen metabolites retained >70% efficacy of their parent compound. Metabolite potencies ranged from 13–3500 nM where the most potent were the 4-hydroxypentyl derivatives of THJ-2201 and THJ-018 and the 4-hydroxyindole derivatives of AM-2201 and JWH-018, also known to be prevalent in vivo metabolites. The efficacy data from in silico experiments were correlated with the in vitro results demonstrating a linear trend (R2 = 0.9457), significant (P < 0.0001) at the 95% confident interval between the binding energies and efficacies of the compounds investigated. In silico analysis with docking and molecular dynamics simulations showed that active metabolites maintained a minimum of six amino acid interactions involving all substructures. The in silico molecular dynamics simulations revealed that the efficacy and potency seemed to be driven by a complex network of hydrophobic weak amino acid-ligand interactions. Most prevalent were CH-π interactions and π-π stackings. This study demonstrates the clear structure-activity relationships well correlated to the molecular dynamics simulations, suggesting that metabolites, especially the 4-hydroxy pentyl metabolites, may contribute to the overall effect of SCs in vivo.

Structure-activity relationship of prevalent synthetic cannabinoid metabolites on hCB1 in vitro and in silico dynamics / Åstrand, Anna; Laudadio, Emiliano; Gameli, Prince S.; Martin, Laura; Carlier, Jeremy; Busardò, Francesco P.; Dahlén, Johan; Wu, Xiongyu; Konradsson, Peter; Vikingsson, Svante; Kronstrand, Robert; Gréen, Henrik. - In: ACTA PHARMACOLOGICA SINICA. - ISSN 1671-4083. - (2025). [Epub ahead of print] [10.1038/s41401-025-01678-5]

Structure-activity relationship of prevalent synthetic cannabinoid metabolites on hCB1 in vitro and in silico dynamics

Laudadio, Emiliano;Gameli, Prince S.;Carlier, Jeremy;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Synthetic cannabinoids (SC) target the human cannabinoid receptor 1 (hCB1) and are extensively metabolized, but the metabolite activity on the hCB1 receptor after a SC intake is largely unknown. In this study we compared the in vitro hCB1 receptor activity of 26 metabolites of the synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRA) JWH-018, AM-2201, THJ-018 and THJ-2201 as a model system for SC metabolite activity to elucidate their structure-activity relationships. The efficacy and potency of metabolites were assessed using an AequoScreen hCB1 receptor assay in triplicates and 7–8 concentration points (20 µg/mL–9.5 ng/mL) were used to construct dose-response curves and to determine EC50 and Emax. In silico docking and molecular dynamics were performed using a model of the active form of the hCB1 receptor with all the metabolites. Final poses were simulated to assess stability under physiological conditions. We showed that carboxylic acid metabolites and 2-hydroxyindole biotransformational products were inactive, while 5-hydroxypentyl SCRA metabolites decreased efficacy to <70%, qualifying them as partial agonists. Eighteen metabolites retained >70% efficacy of their parent compound. Metabolite potencies ranged from 13–3500 nM where the most potent were the 4-hydroxypentyl derivatives of THJ-2201 and THJ-018 and the 4-hydroxyindole derivatives of AM-2201 and JWH-018, also known to be prevalent in vivo metabolites. The efficacy data from in silico experiments were correlated with the in vitro results demonstrating a linear trend (R2 = 0.9457), significant (P < 0.0001) at the 95% confident interval between the binding energies and efficacies of the compounds investigated. In silico analysis with docking and molecular dynamics simulations showed that active metabolites maintained a minimum of six amino acid interactions involving all substructures. The in silico molecular dynamics simulations revealed that the efficacy and potency seemed to be driven by a complex network of hydrophobic weak amino acid-ligand interactions. Most prevalent were CH-π interactions and π-π stackings. This study demonstrates the clear structure-activity relationships well correlated to the molecular dynamics simulations, suggesting that metabolites, especially the 4-hydroxy pentyl metabolites, may contribute to the overall effect of SCs in vivo.
2025
active metabolites; in silico docking and molecular dynamics; pharmacodynamics; structure-activity relationship; synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Åstrand_Structure-activity-relationship-prevalent_2025.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza d'uso: Creative commons
Dimensione 4.27 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.27 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/349612
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact