The use of high-order discontinuous Galerkin (dG) methods is gaining interest in the efficient and accurate simulation of flow problems to meet the growing demand for high-fidelity results. dG methods provide higher accuracy than standard industrial solvers on complex geometries, but they are computationally more expensive. This drawback has prompted the research on adaptive dG discretizations that can vary the level of spatial accuracy according to proper error estimators, reducing the computational effort. In this context the choice of the error indicator, which identifies where the spatial resolution is lacking and guides the refinement of the adaptation algorithm, is a key ingredient, as it can affect the capability of the solver to predict correctly the flow features. This study aims to contribute to the improvement of the computational efficiency of dG methods when applied to industrial applications with the assessment and comparison of two error estimators: (i) a 'simple' estimator based on the combination of the interface pressure jumps and the spectral decay of the coefficients of the modal expansion; (ii) an entropy-adjoint-based error estimator, which targets the generation of spurious entropy. Test cases used for the assessment involve laminar and turbulent flows around bluff bodies, providing insights into attached and separated boundary layers, instabilities, possibly laminar-to-turbulent transition, and vortex shedding.

Comparison of Different Error Estimators for the p-Adaptive Discontinuous Galerkin Solution of Separated Flows / Colombo, A.; Crivellini, A.; Ghidoni, A.; Noventa, G.. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS. - ISSN 1061-8562. - 38:2-3(2024), pp. 135-154. [10.1080/10618562.2024.2329173]

Comparison of Different Error Estimators for the p-Adaptive Discontinuous Galerkin Solution of Separated Flows

Crivellini A.;
2024-01-01

Abstract

The use of high-order discontinuous Galerkin (dG) methods is gaining interest in the efficient and accurate simulation of flow problems to meet the growing demand for high-fidelity results. dG methods provide higher accuracy than standard industrial solvers on complex geometries, but they are computationally more expensive. This drawback has prompted the research on adaptive dG discretizations that can vary the level of spatial accuracy according to proper error estimators, reducing the computational effort. In this context the choice of the error indicator, which identifies where the spatial resolution is lacking and guides the refinement of the adaptation algorithm, is a key ingredient, as it can affect the capability of the solver to predict correctly the flow features. This study aims to contribute to the improvement of the computational efficiency of dG methods when applied to industrial applications with the assessment and comparison of two error estimators: (i) a 'simple' estimator based on the combination of the interface pressure jumps and the spectral decay of the coefficients of the modal expansion; (ii) an entropy-adjoint-based error estimator, which targets the generation of spurious entropy. Test cases used for the assessment involve laminar and turbulent flows around bluff bodies, providing insights into attached and separated boundary layers, instabilities, possibly laminar-to-turbulent transition, and vortex shedding.
2024
Discontinuous Galerkin; high-fidelity simulations; turbulent flow; ILES; p-adaptation
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Colombo_Comparison-Different-Error-Estimators_2024.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza d'uso: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 5.59 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.59 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/347937
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact