On May 2, 2024, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled on the legality of a confiscation order issued by Italian authorities aimed at recovering the Victorious Athlete, a bronze statue from the classical Greek period, from the Getty Museum based in the United States. The ECtHR addressed the case focusing on the legitimacy of the confiscation of the bronze, this being part of the Italian cultural heritage, as it was illicitly exported from Italy. The Court emphasized that the Italian legal system views such confiscations as recuperative actions rather than punitive measures. The Court adopted this approach, highlighting the importance of safeguarding cultural heritage, and considered the confiscation as the only means for the statue to return to Italy’s cultural patrimony. The article sheds some light on the Court’s evolving role in protecting cultural property and balancing state interests with property rights under the European Convention on Human Rights.
La confisca di beni culturali illecitamente acquisiti dinanzi alla Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo: riflessioni a margine del caso dell’Atleta di Fano / Chianese, Michela. - In: LA COMUNITÀ INTERNAZIONALE. - ISSN 0010-5066. - 80:1(2025), pp. 81-108.
La confisca di beni culturali illecitamente acquisiti dinanzi alla Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo: riflessioni a margine del caso dell’Atleta di Fano
Chianese, Michela
Primo
2025-01-01
Abstract
On May 2, 2024, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled on the legality of a confiscation order issued by Italian authorities aimed at recovering the Victorious Athlete, a bronze statue from the classical Greek period, from the Getty Museum based in the United States. The ECtHR addressed the case focusing on the legitimacy of the confiscation of the bronze, this being part of the Italian cultural heritage, as it was illicitly exported from Italy. The Court emphasized that the Italian legal system views such confiscations as recuperative actions rather than punitive measures. The Court adopted this approach, highlighting the importance of safeguarding cultural heritage, and considered the confiscation as the only means for the statue to return to Italy’s cultural patrimony. The article sheds some light on the Court’s evolving role in protecting cultural property and balancing state interests with property rights under the European Convention on Human Rights.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
6. chianese.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza d'uso:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
626.74 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
626.74 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.