Objective: The study objectives were (i) to explore the agreement between the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) ultrasound lesions of enthesitis and physical examination in assessing enthesitis in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and (ii) to investigate the prevalence and clinical relevance of subclinical enthesitis in this population. Methods: Twenty rheumatology centers participated in this cross-sectional study. Patients with SpA, including axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), underwent both ultrasound scan and physical examination of large lower limb entheses. The OMERACT ultrasound lesions of enthesitis were considered, along with a recently proposed definition for “active enthesitis” by our group. Subclinical enthesitis was defined as the presence of “active enthesitis” in ≥1 enthesis in patients with SpA without clinical enthesitis (ie, number of positive entheses on physical examination and Leeds Enthesitis Index score = 0). Results: A total of 4,130 entheses in 413 patients with SpA (224 with axSpA and 189 with PsA) were evaluated through ultrasound and physical examination. Agreement between ultrasound and physical examination ranged from moderate (ie, enthesophytes) to almost perfect (ie, power Doppler and “active enthesitis”). Patellar tendon entheses demonstrated the highest agreement, whereas Achilles tendon insertion showed the lowest. Among 158 (38.3%) of 413 patients with SpA with clinical enthesitis, 108 (68.4%) exhibited no “active enthesitis” on ultrasound. Conversely, of those 255 without clinical enthesitis, 39 (15.3%) showed subclinical enthesitis. Subclinical enthesitis was strongly associated with local structural damage. However, no differences were observed regarding the demographic and clinical profiles of patients with SpA with and without subclinical enthesitis. Conclusion: Our study underscores the need for a comprehensive tool integrating ultrasound and physical examination for assessing enthesitis in patients with SpA. (Figure presented.).

Relationship Between Ultrasound and Physical Examination in the Assessment of Enthesitis in Patients With Spondyloarthritis: Results From the DEUS Multicenter Study / Di Matteo, Andrea; Di Donato, Stefano; Smerilli, Gianluca; Becciolini, Andrea; Camarda, Federica; Cauli, Alberto; Cazenave, Tomás; Cipolletta, Edoardo; Corradini, Davide; de Agustin, Juan Jose; Destro Castaniti, Giulia M.; Di Donato, Eleonora; Duran, Emine; Farisogullari, Bayram; Fornaro, Marco; Francioso, Francesca; Giorgis, Pamela; Granados, Raquel; Granel, Amelia; Hernandez‐diaz, Cristina; Horvath, Rudolf; Hurnakova, Jana; Jesus, Diogo; Karadag, Omer; Li, Ling; Li, Yang; Lommano, Maria G.; Marin, Josefina; Martire, María V.; Michelena, Xabier; Muntean, Laura; Piga, Matteo; Rosemffet, Marcos; Rovisco, João; Salaffi, Fausto; Saraiva, Liliana; Scioscia, Crescenzio; Tamas, Maria‐magdalena; Tanimura, Shun; Venetsanopoulou, Aliki; Ventura Rios, Lucio; Villota, Orlando; Villota‐eraso, Catalina; Voulgari, Paraskevi V.; Vukatana, Gentiana; Zacariaz Hereter, Johana; Grassi, Walter; Filippucci, Emilio. - In: ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY. - ISSN 2326-5191. - 77:1(2025), pp. 22-33. [10.1002/art.42971]

Relationship Between Ultrasound and Physical Examination in the Assessment of Enthesitis in Patients With Spondyloarthritis: Results From the DEUS Multicenter Study

Cipolletta, Edoardo;Di Donato, Eleonora;Francioso, Francesca;Lommano, Maria G.;Salaffi, Fausto;Grassi, Walter;Filippucci, Emilio
2025-01-01

Abstract

Objective: The study objectives were (i) to explore the agreement between the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) ultrasound lesions of enthesitis and physical examination in assessing enthesitis in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and (ii) to investigate the prevalence and clinical relevance of subclinical enthesitis in this population. Methods: Twenty rheumatology centers participated in this cross-sectional study. Patients with SpA, including axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), underwent both ultrasound scan and physical examination of large lower limb entheses. The OMERACT ultrasound lesions of enthesitis were considered, along with a recently proposed definition for “active enthesitis” by our group. Subclinical enthesitis was defined as the presence of “active enthesitis” in ≥1 enthesis in patients with SpA without clinical enthesitis (ie, number of positive entheses on physical examination and Leeds Enthesitis Index score = 0). Results: A total of 4,130 entheses in 413 patients with SpA (224 with axSpA and 189 with PsA) were evaluated through ultrasound and physical examination. Agreement between ultrasound and physical examination ranged from moderate (ie, enthesophytes) to almost perfect (ie, power Doppler and “active enthesitis”). Patellar tendon entheses demonstrated the highest agreement, whereas Achilles tendon insertion showed the lowest. Among 158 (38.3%) of 413 patients with SpA with clinical enthesitis, 108 (68.4%) exhibited no “active enthesitis” on ultrasound. Conversely, of those 255 without clinical enthesitis, 39 (15.3%) showed subclinical enthesitis. Subclinical enthesitis was strongly associated with local structural damage. However, no differences were observed regarding the demographic and clinical profiles of patients with SpA with and without subclinical enthesitis. Conclusion: Our study underscores the need for a comprehensive tool integrating ultrasound and physical examination for assessing enthesitis in patients with SpA. (Figure presented.).
2025
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Arthritis Rheumatology - 2024 - Di Matteo - Relationship Between Ultrasound and Physical Examination in the Assessment of.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza d'uso: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 472.29 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
472.29 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/342296
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact