Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of artificial neural networks compared with discriminant analysis in classifying positive and negative response to the cholinesterase inhibitor donepezil in a group of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. Design: Convenience sample. Setting: Patients with mild to moderate AD consecutively admitted to a geriatric day hospital and treated with donepezil 5 mg/day. Participants: Sixty-one older patients of both sexes with AD. Measurements: Accuracy in detecting subjects sensitive (responders) or not (nonresponders) to 3-month therapy with ANNs. The criterion standard for evaluation of efficacy was the scores of Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive portion and Clinician's Interview Based Impression of Change-plus scales. Results: ANNs were more effective in discriminating between responders and nonresponders than other advanced statistical methods, particularly linear discriminant analysis. The total accuracy in predicting the outcome was 92.59%. Conclusions: ANNs appear to be a useful tool in detecting patient responsiveness to pharmacological treatment in AD.

Use of artificial networks in clinical trials: a pilot study to predict responsiveness to donepezil in Alzheimer's disease / Mecocci, Patrizia; Grossi, E.; Buscema, M.; Intraligi, M.; Savarè, R.; Rinaldi, Patrizia; Cherubini, Antonio; Senin, Umberto. - In: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY. - ISSN 0002-8614. - STAMPA. - 50:(2002), pp. 1857-1860.

Use of artificial networks in clinical trials: a pilot study to predict responsiveness to donepezil in Alzheimer's disease

CHERUBINI, Antonio;
2002-01-01

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of artificial neural networks compared with discriminant analysis in classifying positive and negative response to the cholinesterase inhibitor donepezil in a group of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. Design: Convenience sample. Setting: Patients with mild to moderate AD consecutively admitted to a geriatric day hospital and treated with donepezil 5 mg/day. Participants: Sixty-one older patients of both sexes with AD. Measurements: Accuracy in detecting subjects sensitive (responders) or not (nonresponders) to 3-month therapy with ANNs. The criterion standard for evaluation of efficacy was the scores of Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive portion and Clinician's Interview Based Impression of Change-plus scales. Results: ANNs were more effective in discriminating between responders and nonresponders than other advanced statistical methods, particularly linear discriminant analysis. The total accuracy in predicting the outcome was 92.59%. Conclusions: ANNs appear to be a useful tool in detecting patient responsiveness to pharmacological treatment in AD.
2002
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/330298
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 23
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 23
social impact