Recent observations of tree regeneration failures following large and severe disturbances, particularly under warm and dry conditions, have raised concerns about the resilience of forest ecosystems and their recovery dynamics in the face of climate change. We investigated the recovery of temperate forests in Europe after large and severe disturbance events (i.e., resulting in more than 70% canopy loss in patches larger than 1 ha), with a range of one to five decades since the disturbance occurred. The study included 143 sites of different forest types and management practices that had experienced 28 disturbance events, including windthrow (132 sites), fire (six sites), and bark beetle outbreaks (five sites). We focused on assessing post-disturbance tree density, structure, and composition as key indicators of forest resilience. We compared post-disturbance height-weighted densities with site-specific pre-disturbance densities to qualitatively assess the potential for structural and compositional recovery, overall and for dominant tree species, respectively. Additionally, we analyzed the ecological drivers of post-windthrow tree density, such as forest management, topography, and post-disturbance aridity, using a series of generalized additive models. The descriptive results show that European temperate forests have been resilient to past large and severe disturbances and concurrent climate conditions, albeit with lower resilience to high-severity fire compared with other disturbance agents. Across sites and disturbance agents, the potential for structural recovery was greater than that of compositional recovery, with a large proportion of plots becoming dominated by early-successional species after disturbance. The models showed that increasing elevation and salvage logging negatively affect post-windthrow regeneration, particularly for late-successional species, while pioneer species are negatively affected by increasing summer aridity. These findings provide a key baseline for assessing future recovery and resilience following the recent occurrence of widespread disturbance in the region and in anticipation of future conditions characterized by increasing heat and drought stress.

Recovery and resilience of European temperate forests after large and severe disturbances / Cerioni, Matteo; Brabec, Marek; Bače, Radek; Bāders, Endijs; Bončina, Andrej; Brůna, Josef; Chećko, Ewa; Cordonnier, Thomas; de Koning, Johannes H. C.; Diaci, Jurij; Dobrowolska, Dorota; Dountchev, Alexander; Engelhart, Jeroen; Fidej, Gal; Fuhr, Marc; Garbarino, Matteo; Jansons, Āris; Keren, Srdjan; Kitenberga, Māra; Klopčič, Matija; Konôpka, Bohdan; Kopecký, Martin; Köster, Kajar; Kucbel, Stanislav; Lacombe, Eric; Laurent, Lisa; Leyman, Anja; Lingua, Emanuele; Macek, Martin; Maciejewski, Zbigniew; Malandra, Francesco; Marzano, Raffaella; Metslaid, Marek; Morresi, Donato; Panayotov, Momchil; Pawlak, Bogdan; Pittner, Ján; Šebeň, Vladimír; Socha, Jarosław; Svoboda, Miroslav; Szwagrzyk, Jerzy; Tsvetanov, Nickolay; Urbinati, Carlo; Vallet, Patrick; Van de Kerckhove, Peter; Vandekerkhove, Kris; Vencurik, Jaroslav; Vitali, Alessandro; Vodde, Floortje; Wild, Jan; Nagel, Thomas A.. - In: GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY. - ISSN 1354-1013. - 30:2(2024). [10.1111/gcb.17159]

Recovery and resilience of European temperate forests after large and severe disturbances

Carlo Urbinati;Alessandro Vitali;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Recent observations of tree regeneration failures following large and severe disturbances, particularly under warm and dry conditions, have raised concerns about the resilience of forest ecosystems and their recovery dynamics in the face of climate change. We investigated the recovery of temperate forests in Europe after large and severe disturbance events (i.e., resulting in more than 70% canopy loss in patches larger than 1 ha), with a range of one to five decades since the disturbance occurred. The study included 143 sites of different forest types and management practices that had experienced 28 disturbance events, including windthrow (132 sites), fire (six sites), and bark beetle outbreaks (five sites). We focused on assessing post-disturbance tree density, structure, and composition as key indicators of forest resilience. We compared post-disturbance height-weighted densities with site-specific pre-disturbance densities to qualitatively assess the potential for structural and compositional recovery, overall and for dominant tree species, respectively. Additionally, we analyzed the ecological drivers of post-windthrow tree density, such as forest management, topography, and post-disturbance aridity, using a series of generalized additive models. The descriptive results show that European temperate forests have been resilient to past large and severe disturbances and concurrent climate conditions, albeit with lower resilience to high-severity fire compared with other disturbance agents. Across sites and disturbance agents, the potential for structural recovery was greater than that of compositional recovery, with a large proportion of plots becoming dominated by early-successional species after disturbance. The models showed that increasing elevation and salvage logging negatively affect post-windthrow regeneration, particularly for late-successional species, while pioneer species are negatively affected by increasing summer aridity. These findings provide a key baseline for assessing future recovery and resilience following the recent occurrence of widespread disturbance in the region and in anticipation of future conditions characterized by increasing heat and drought stress.
2024
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/329954
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact