Background: Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore cephalosporin with promising activity against most carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CRGNB). However, extensive postmarketing experiences are lacking. This study aimed to analyse the early experience on cefiderocol postmarketing use at three tertiary care hospitals in Italy. Methods: We retrospectively included patients with infections caused by CRGNB treated with cefiderocol at three Italian tertiary care hospitals from 1 March 2021 to 30 June 2022. A multivariate Cox model was used to identify predictors of 30 day mortality. A propensity score (PS) analysis with inverse probability weighting (IPW) was also performed to compare the treatment effect of cefiderocol monotherapy (CM) versus combination regimens (CCRs). Results: The cohort included 142 patients (72% male, median age 67 years, with 89 cases of Acinetobacter baumannii infection, 22 cases of Klebsiella pneumoniae, 27 cases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 4 of other pathogens). The 30 day all-cause mortality was 37% (52/142). We found no association between bacterial species and mortality. In multivariate analysis, a Charlson Comorbidity Index >3 was an independent predictor of mortality (HR 5.02, 95% CI 2.37-10.66, P < 0.001). In contrast, polymicrobial infection (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21-0.82, P < 0.05) was associated with lower mortality. There was no significant difference in mortality between patients receiving CM (n = 70) and those receiving a CCR (n = 72) (33% versus 40%, respectively), even when adjusted for IPW-PS (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.63-1.96, P = 0.71). Conclusions: Real-life data confirm that cefiderocol is a promising option against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections, even as monotherapy.
Cefiderocol use for the treatment of infections by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: an Italian multicentre real-life experience / Piccica, Matteo; Spinicci, Michele; Botta, Annarita; Bianco, Vincenzo; Lagi, Filippo; Graziani, Lucia; Faragona, Alessandro; Parrella, Roberto; Giani, Tommaso; Bartolini, Andrea; Morroni, Gianluca; Bernardo, Mariano; Rossolini, Gian Maria; Tavio, Marcello; Giacometti, Andrea; Bartoloni, Alessandro. - In: JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY. - ISSN 0305-7453. - 78:11(2023), pp. 2752-2761. [10.1093/jac/dkad298]
Cefiderocol use for the treatment of infections by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: an Italian multicentre real-life experience
Morroni, Gianluca;Tavio, Marcello;Giacometti, Andrea;
2023-01-01
Abstract
Background: Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore cephalosporin with promising activity against most carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CRGNB). However, extensive postmarketing experiences are lacking. This study aimed to analyse the early experience on cefiderocol postmarketing use at three tertiary care hospitals in Italy. Methods: We retrospectively included patients with infections caused by CRGNB treated with cefiderocol at three Italian tertiary care hospitals from 1 March 2021 to 30 June 2022. A multivariate Cox model was used to identify predictors of 30 day mortality. A propensity score (PS) analysis with inverse probability weighting (IPW) was also performed to compare the treatment effect of cefiderocol monotherapy (CM) versus combination regimens (CCRs). Results: The cohort included 142 patients (72% male, median age 67 years, with 89 cases of Acinetobacter baumannii infection, 22 cases of Klebsiella pneumoniae, 27 cases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 4 of other pathogens). The 30 day all-cause mortality was 37% (52/142). We found no association between bacterial species and mortality. In multivariate analysis, a Charlson Comorbidity Index >3 was an independent predictor of mortality (HR 5.02, 95% CI 2.37-10.66, P < 0.001). In contrast, polymicrobial infection (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21-0.82, P < 0.05) was associated with lower mortality. There was no significant difference in mortality between patients receiving CM (n = 70) and those receiving a CCR (n = 72) (33% versus 40%, respectively), even when adjusted for IPW-PS (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.63-1.96, P = 0.71). Conclusions: Real-life data confirm that cefiderocol is a promising option against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections, even as monotherapy.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Piccica_Cefiderocol-use-treatment-infections_2023.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza d'uso:
Creative commons
Dimensione
2.9 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.9 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.