Restoration is considered an effective strategy to accelerate the recovery of biological communities at local scale. However, the effects of restoration actions in the marine ecosystems are still unpredictable. We performed a global analysis of published literature to identify the factors increasing the probability of restoration success in coastal and marine systems. Our results confirm that the majority of active restoration initiatives are still concentrated in the northern hemisphere and that most of information gathered from restoration efforts derives from a relatively small subset of species. The analysis also indicates that many studies are still experimental in nature, covering small spatial and temporal scales. Despite the limits of assessing restoration effectiveness in absence of a standardized definition of success, the context (degree of human impact, ecosystem type, habitat) of where the restoration activity is undertaken is of greater relevance to a successful outcome than how (method) the restoration is carried out. Contrary to expectations, we found that restoration is not necessarily more successful closer to protected areas (PA) and in areas of moderate human impact. This result can be motivated by the limits in assessing the success of interventions and by the tendency of selecting areas in more obvious need of restoration, where the potential of actively restoring a degraded site is more evident. Restoration sites prioritization considering human uses and conservation status present in the region is of vital importance to obtain the intended outcomes and galvanize further actions.

Where Is More Important Than How in Coastal and Marine Ecosystems Restoration / Fraschetti, Simonetta; Mcowen, Chris; Papa, Loredana; Papadopoulou, Nadia; Bilan, Meri; Boström, Christoffer; Capdevila, Pol; Carreiro-Silva, Marina; Carugati, Laura; Cebrian, Emma; Coll, Marta; Dailianis, Thanos; Danovaro, Roberto; De Leo, Francesco; Fiorentino, Dario; Gagnon, Karine; Gambi, Cristina; Garrabou, Joaquim; Gerovasileiou, Vasilis; Hereu, Bernat; Kipson, Silvija; Kotta, Jonne; Ledoux, Jean-Baptiste; Linares, Cristina; Martin, Juliette; Medrano, Alba; Montero-Serra, ; Morato, Telmo; Pusceddu, Antonio; Sevastou, Katerina; Smith, Christopher J.; Verdura, Jana; Guarnieri, Giuseppe. - In: FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE. - ISSN 2296-7745. - ELETTRONICO. - 8:626843(2021). [10.3389/fmars.2021.626843]

Where Is More Important Than How in Coastal and Marine Ecosystems Restoration

Danovaro, Roberto
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Gambi, Cristina
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Restoration is considered an effective strategy to accelerate the recovery of biological communities at local scale. However, the effects of restoration actions in the marine ecosystems are still unpredictable. We performed a global analysis of published literature to identify the factors increasing the probability of restoration success in coastal and marine systems. Our results confirm that the majority of active restoration initiatives are still concentrated in the northern hemisphere and that most of information gathered from restoration efforts derives from a relatively small subset of species. The analysis also indicates that many studies are still experimental in nature, covering small spatial and temporal scales. Despite the limits of assessing restoration effectiveness in absence of a standardized definition of success, the context (degree of human impact, ecosystem type, habitat) of where the restoration activity is undertaken is of greater relevance to a successful outcome than how (method) the restoration is carried out. Contrary to expectations, we found that restoration is not necessarily more successful closer to protected areas (PA) and in areas of moderate human impact. This result can be motivated by the limits in assessing the success of interventions and by the tendency of selecting areas in more obvious need of restoration, where the potential of actively restoring a degraded site is more evident. Restoration sites prioritization considering human uses and conservation status present in the region is of vital importance to obtain the intended outcomes and galvanize further actions.
2021
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
fmars-08-626843.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza d'uso: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.37 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.37 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/300880
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 31
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 29
social impact