Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the benefit of patent foramen ovale closure over medical therapy alone for patients who have had a stroke that has been attributed to the patent foramen ovale. Nevertheless, there are many areas of uncertainty and controversy related to patient selection, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. We summarize the available data on these challenging topics and attempt to provide some clarity and future directions for clinicians and investigators.
Uncertainties and controversies in the management of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack patients with patent foramen ovale / Kasner, S. E.; Lattanzi, S.; Fonseca, A. C.; Elgendy, A. Y.. - In: STROKE. - ISSN 0039-2499. - 52:12(2021), pp. E806-E819. [10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034778]
Uncertainties and controversies in the management of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack patients with patent foramen ovale
Lattanzi S.;
2021-01-01
Abstract
Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the benefit of patent foramen ovale closure over medical therapy alone for patients who have had a stroke that has been attributed to the patent foramen ovale. Nevertheless, there are many areas of uncertainty and controversy related to patient selection, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. We summarize the available data on these challenging topics and attempt to provide some clarity and future directions for clinicians and investigators.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.