Limited stride-time variability is considered a marker of safe walking. Thus, the measurement of stride time is a meaningful information for gait analysis. The use of machine-learning (ML) techniques has been proven to be useful to this aim, even if the amount of data provided as input influences the computation process. The present study is aiming to analyze the sensitivity of the experimental protocol (number of sensors and signals) on the performance of a stride-time measurement system based on ML interpretation of surface EMG signals (sEMG). To this purpose, sEMG signals from ten leg muscles of 30 volunteers are used to train a single-layer neural network. Five experimental protocols (from five to one sEMG sensors per leg) are comparatively tested. Results show that reducing the sEMG-protocol complexity (less sensors utilized) is decreasing the prediction performances. Based on the test results, this study proposes an experimental protocol composed of two sEMG sensors per leg (over gastrocnemius lateralis and tibialis anterior), as the best compromise between the need of a simplified experimental set-up and the necessity of high performances (F1-score±SD = 99.0±1.2%; mean absolute value, MAE±SD = 17.9±4.3 ms). The use of only two sEMG probes is going to have a great impact on gait analysis, improving patient comfort and reducing clinical costs and time consumption. A possible, further reduction of experimental protocol to a single muscle (gastrocnemius lateralis) is feasible accepting a less efficient prediction of the stride-time.

Measurement of stride time by machine learning: sensitivity analysis for the simplification of the experimental protocol / Di Nardo, F.; Cucchiarelli, A.; Scalise, L.; Morbidoni, C.. - In: IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT. - ISSN 0018-9456. - ELETTRONICO. - 71:(2022), pp. 1-9. [10.1109/TIM.2022.3165257]

Measurement of stride time by machine learning: sensitivity analysis for the simplification of the experimental protocol

Di Nardo F.
;
Cucchiarelli A.;Scalise L.;Morbidoni C.
2022-01-01

Abstract

Limited stride-time variability is considered a marker of safe walking. Thus, the measurement of stride time is a meaningful information for gait analysis. The use of machine-learning (ML) techniques has been proven to be useful to this aim, even if the amount of data provided as input influences the computation process. The present study is aiming to analyze the sensitivity of the experimental protocol (number of sensors and signals) on the performance of a stride-time measurement system based on ML interpretation of surface EMG signals (sEMG). To this purpose, sEMG signals from ten leg muscles of 30 volunteers are used to train a single-layer neural network. Five experimental protocols (from five to one sEMG sensors per leg) are comparatively tested. Results show that reducing the sEMG-protocol complexity (less sensors utilized) is decreasing the prediction performances. Based on the test results, this study proposes an experimental protocol composed of two sEMG sensors per leg (over gastrocnemius lateralis and tibialis anterior), as the best compromise between the need of a simplified experimental set-up and the necessity of high performances (F1-score±SD = 99.0±1.2%; mean absolute value, MAE±SD = 17.9±4.3 ms). The use of only two sEMG probes is going to have a great impact on gait analysis, improving patient comfort and reducing clinical costs and time consumption. A possible, further reduction of experimental protocol to a single muscle (gastrocnemius lateralis) is feasible accepting a less efficient prediction of the stride-time.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/298282
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact