Six Italian non-accredited laboratories participated to an interlaboratory study aimed at measuring Differential Pressure (DP) and Bacterial Filtration Efficiency (BFE) of three face-mask models using methods in-line with EN 14683 standard. Methodological non-conformities were annotated. Repeatability and reproducibility on quintuplicate samples were calculated according to ISO 5725-2. Sample stability was also assessed. Laboratories were ranked according to the total standard deviation over all samples and proficiency was evaluated using z-score according to ISO 13528. Although some non-conformities were present, performances for the DP measurements were always acceptable. One laboratory had to revise the bacterial suspension preparation for the BFE test. Overall, non-accredited laboratories working during pandemic emergency performed satisfactorily. Sample-to-sample variability impacted measurement repeatability. BFE values above 98% showed good repeatability (≤1.0%) and reproducibility (≤6.1%), but high BFE uncertainty was associated to community masks. Our findings suggest that relevant face-mask conformity standards should consider uncertainty of BFE and DP measurements.

Measuring breathability and bacterial filtration efficiency of face masks in the pandemic context: A round robin study with proficiency testing among non-accredited laboratories / Tessarolo, Francesco; Nollo, Giandomenico; Benedetti, Luca; Helfer, Fabrizia; Rovati, Luigi; Ferrari, Alberto; Marchetti, Giulio; Reverberi, Federico; Baglio, Salvo; Tuccitto, Nunzio; Stefani, Stefania; Stracquadanio, Stefano; Caraci, Filippo; Terrasi, Antonio; Tricomi, Alessia; Musumeci, Mario; Miraglia, Andrea; Cuttone, Giacomo; Cosentino, Sofia; Agostino Vitali, Luca; Petrelli, Dezemona; Ilaria Ciancia, Sonia; Mingoia, Marina; Castellini, Paolo; Simoni, Serena; Montalto, Luigi; Baleani, Alessia; Chiariotti, Paolo; Paone, Nicola. - In: MEASUREMENT. - ISSN 0263-2241. - ELETTRONICO. - 189:(2022). [10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110481]

Measuring breathability and bacterial filtration efficiency of face masks in the pandemic context: A round robin study with proficiency testing among non-accredited laboratories

Stefani, Stefania;Agostino Vitali, Luca;Mingoia, Marina;Castellini, Paolo;Simoni, Serena;Montalto, Luigi;Baleani, Alessia;Chiariotti, Paolo;Paone, Nicola
2022-01-01

Abstract

Six Italian non-accredited laboratories participated to an interlaboratory study aimed at measuring Differential Pressure (DP) and Bacterial Filtration Efficiency (BFE) of three face-mask models using methods in-line with EN 14683 standard. Methodological non-conformities were annotated. Repeatability and reproducibility on quintuplicate samples were calculated according to ISO 5725-2. Sample stability was also assessed. Laboratories were ranked according to the total standard deviation over all samples and proficiency was evaluated using z-score according to ISO 13528. Although some non-conformities were present, performances for the DP measurements were always acceptable. One laboratory had to revise the bacterial suspension preparation for the BFE test. Overall, non-accredited laboratories working during pandemic emergency performed satisfactorily. Sample-to-sample variability impacted measurement repeatability. BFE values above 98% showed good repeatability (≤1.0%) and reproducibility (≤6.1%), but high BFE uncertainty was associated to community masks. Our findings suggest that relevant face-mask conformity standards should consider uncertainty of BFE and DP measurements.
2022
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0263224121013658-main.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza d'uso: Creative commons
Dimensione 3.59 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.59 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/295721
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact