Several studies highlight that the method and the object of analysis of Agent-Based models are in various respects in stark contrast to the prevailing neoclassical paradigm and therefore should be included in the traditions of alternative economic thought. In this paper, however, we show that distinctive features of the neoclassical theory can be found in most of the AB literature. Through a systematic review of most cited academic papers published in the period 1996–2019 and dedicated to Agent-Based models, we show that a “neoclassical influence” can be detected in 61% of papers, while only 39% do not have links with the mainstream neoclassical approach. We also note that after the “great recession” started in 2008 the neoclassical influences on AB literature decline to a significant extent.
Neoclassical influences in agent-based literature: A systematic review / Brancaccio, Emiiano; Gallegati, Mauro; Giammetti, Raffaele. - In: JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS. - ISSN 1467-6419. - 36:2(2022), pp. 350-385. [10.1111/joes.12470]
Neoclassical influences in agent-based literature: A systematic review
Mauro Gallegati;Raffaele Giammetti
2022-01-01
Abstract
Several studies highlight that the method and the object of analysis of Agent-Based models are in various respects in stark contrast to the prevailing neoclassical paradigm and therefore should be included in the traditions of alternative economic thought. In this paper, however, we show that distinctive features of the neoclassical theory can be found in most of the AB literature. Through a systematic review of most cited academic papers published in the period 1996–2019 and dedicated to Agent-Based models, we show that a “neoclassical influence” can be detected in 61% of papers, while only 39% do not have links with the mainstream neoclassical approach. We also note that after the “great recession” started in 2008 the neoclassical influences on AB literature decline to a significant extent.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
joes.12470.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza d'uso:
Creative commons
Dimensione
663.37 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
663.37 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.