This paper investigates the nonlinear dynamic behavior of a cantilever beam made of composite material without and with lumped mass fixed along its length. The analysis compares the results coming from analytical and numerical modeling with experimental observations. The first part focuses on the analytical model. The model takes into account the nonlinearity derived from large amplitude vibration and inertia. The second part deals with the experimental test, where the specimen and the data acquisition are defined. Then, the nonlinearity of the acquired data is determined by the fitting time history (FTH) technique. The third part deals with the finite element model. Finally, the results obtained by the analytical method, the experimental method, and the numerical method are compared between each other.

Nonlinear vibrations of a composite beam in large displacements: Analytical, numerical, and experimental approaches / Utzeri, M.; Sasso, M.; Chiappini, G.; Lenci, S.. - In: JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS. - ISSN 1555-1415. - ELETTRONICO. - 16:2(2021). [10.1115/1.4048913]

Nonlinear vibrations of a composite beam in large displacements: Analytical, numerical, and experimental approaches

Utzeri M.
Primo
;
Sasso M.
Secondo
;
Chiappini G.
Penultimo
;
Lenci S.
Ultimo
2021-01-01

Abstract

This paper investigates the nonlinear dynamic behavior of a cantilever beam made of composite material without and with lumped mass fixed along its length. The analysis compares the results coming from analytical and numerical modeling with experimental observations. The first part focuses on the analytical model. The model takes into account the nonlinearity derived from large amplitude vibration and inertia. The second part deals with the experimental test, where the specimen and the data acquisition are defined. Then, the nonlinearity of the acquired data is determined by the fitting time history (FTH) technique. The third part deals with the finite element model. Finally, the results obtained by the analytical method, the experimental method, and the numerical method are compared between each other.
2021
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
cnd_016_02_021002.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza d'uso: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 2.87 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.87 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Post_Print_Reduced.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: ASME ©; CC-BY distribution license
Tipologia: Documento in post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza d'uso: Creative commons
Dimensione 6.95 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
6.95 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/286637
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact