INTRODUCTION: The outbreak of COVID-19 epidemics has challenged the provision of health care worldwide, highlighting the main flaws of some national health systems with respect to their capacity to cope with the needs of frail subjects. People experiencing disability due to COVID-19 express specific rehabilitation needs that deserve a systematic evidence-based approach. The aim of this article is to provide the rehabilitation community with updates on the latest scientific literature on rehabilitation needs due to COVID-19. The first rapid "living"review will present the results of a systematic search performed up to March 31st, 2020. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic search in PubMed, Pedro, and Google Scholar was performed using the search terms: "COVID-19,""Coronavirus,""severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2,""rehabilitation,""physical therapy modalities,""exercise,""occupational therapy,"and "late complications."Papers published up to March 31st, 2020, in English, were included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Out of the 2758 articles retrieved, nine were included in the present review. Four of them are "calls for action", three provide recommendations about rehabilitation interventions in the acute phase, two address the needs of people quarantined at home or with restricted mobility due to the lockdown, and one provides a Core Outcome Set to be used in clinical trials to test the efficacy of health strategies in managing COVID-19 patients. CONCLUSIONS: All selected papers were based on previous literature and not on the current COVID-19 pandemic. Main messages included: 1) early rehabilitation should be granted to inpatients with COVID-19; 2) people with restricted mobility due to quarantine or lockdown should receive exercise programs to reduce the risk of frailty, sarcopenia, cognitive decline and depression; 3) telerehabilitation may represent the first option for people at home. Further updates are warranted in order to characterize the emerging disability in COVID-19 survivors and the adverse effects on the health of chronically disabled people.

Systematic rapid "living" review on rehabilitation needs due to covid-19: update to march 31st 2020 / Ceravolo, Maria G; De Sire, Alessandro; Andrenelli, Elisa; Negrini, Francesco; Negrini, Stefano. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE. - ISSN 1973-9095. - ELETTRONICO. - 56:3(2020), pp. 347-353. [10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06329-7]

Systematic rapid "living" review on rehabilitation needs due to covid-19: update to march 31st 2020

Ceravolo, Maria G;Andrenelli, Elisa;
2020-01-01

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The outbreak of COVID-19 epidemics has challenged the provision of health care worldwide, highlighting the main flaws of some national health systems with respect to their capacity to cope with the needs of frail subjects. People experiencing disability due to COVID-19 express specific rehabilitation needs that deserve a systematic evidence-based approach. The aim of this article is to provide the rehabilitation community with updates on the latest scientific literature on rehabilitation needs due to COVID-19. The first rapid "living"review will present the results of a systematic search performed up to March 31st, 2020. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic search in PubMed, Pedro, and Google Scholar was performed using the search terms: "COVID-19,""Coronavirus,""severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2,""rehabilitation,""physical therapy modalities,""exercise,""occupational therapy,"and "late complications."Papers published up to March 31st, 2020, in English, were included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Out of the 2758 articles retrieved, nine were included in the present review. Four of them are "calls for action", three provide recommendations about rehabilitation interventions in the acute phase, two address the needs of people quarantined at home or with restricted mobility due to the lockdown, and one provides a Core Outcome Set to be used in clinical trials to test the efficacy of health strategies in managing COVID-19 patients. CONCLUSIONS: All selected papers were based on previous literature and not on the current COVID-19 pandemic. Main messages included: 1) early rehabilitation should be granted to inpatients with COVID-19; 2) people with restricted mobility due to quarantine or lockdown should receive exercise programs to reduce the risk of frailty, sarcopenia, cognitive decline and depression; 3) telerehabilitation may represent the first option for people at home. Further updates are warranted in order to characterize the emerging disability in COVID-19 survivors and the adverse effects on the health of chronically disabled people.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
rapid review rehab covid19_Ceravolo.pdf

Open Access dal 01/07/2021

Descrizione: This is a postprint version of the article published in EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE. This version is free to view and download to private research and study only. Not for redistribution or re-use. ©Edizioni Minerva Medica. The final published article is available online on Minerva Medica website at https:doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06329-7. Cite this article as Ceravolo MG, de Sire A, Andrenelli E, Negrini F, Negrini S. Systematic rapid “living” review on rehabilitation needs due to COVID-19: update to March 31st, 2020. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2020;56:347-53. DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06329-7
Tipologia: Documento in post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza d'uso: Licenza specifica dell’editore
Dimensione 705.3 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
705.3 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
R33Y2020N03A0347.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza d'uso: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 369.68 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
369.68 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/277269
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 61
  • Scopus 95
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 91
social impact