In this paper the generational variable is used as a key to the interpretation of the changes that are taking place in medical professionalism. The hypothesis is that several changes in the practice of medicine are due to the generational change (as well as to the feminization of the profession). From many years the sociology of professions has tried to understand the reasons for the different ways of practicing the medical profession, however, it has neglected the generational gap. After reconstructing the debate on new medical professionalism, the paper focuses on three different theoretical models (those of Hafferty and Castellani 2010, Julia Evetts 2011 and Vicarelli and Spina 2013), in order to re-interpret them by using the generational dynamic. Greater attention is paid to one model in particular, analysing in detail the concept of collaborative community. By using the main findings of some empirical researches, the paper highlights how the concept of community changes when a generational change takes place. Further empirical research should be carried out in order to verify a theoretical hypothesis that, nevertheless, appears to be compelling, showing the importance of the generational variable as reading key to the interpretation of diverse medical practice and, ultimately, of the variety of professionalisms.

Generational gap e nuovo professionalismo medico. Note preliminari per una ricerca empirica / Spina, Elena. - In: RASSEGNA ITALIANA DI SOCIOLOGIA. - ISSN 0486-0349. - STAMPA. - 1(2017), pp. 127-152. [10.1423/86361]

Generational gap e nuovo professionalismo medico. Note preliminari per una ricerca empirica

SPINA, Elena
2017-01-01

Abstract

In this paper the generational variable is used as a key to the interpretation of the changes that are taking place in medical professionalism. The hypothesis is that several changes in the practice of medicine are due to the generational change (as well as to the feminization of the profession). From many years the sociology of professions has tried to understand the reasons for the different ways of practicing the medical profession, however, it has neglected the generational gap. After reconstructing the debate on new medical professionalism, the paper focuses on three different theoretical models (those of Hafferty and Castellani 2010, Julia Evetts 2011 and Vicarelli and Spina 2013), in order to re-interpret them by using the generational dynamic. Greater attention is paid to one model in particular, analysing in detail the concept of collaborative community. By using the main findings of some empirical researches, the paper highlights how the concept of community changes when a generational change takes place. Further empirical research should be carried out in order to verify a theoretical hypothesis that, nevertheless, appears to be compelling, showing the importance of the generational variable as reading key to the interpretation of diverse medical practice and, ultimately, of the variety of professionalisms.
2017
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/248451
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact