The influence of pruning date on yield control and ripening rate of spur-pruned Sangiovese grapevines was investigated over two years (2013 and 2014). Winter pruning was applied on 1 or 4 Feb (mid dormancy); 1 or 5 March (late dormancy); 2 or 7 April (bud swell); 2 or 7 May (flowers closely pressed together); and 1 or 6 June (40 to 50% of flower caps fallen), respectively. Vine yield and fruit composition at harvest were not affected by shift­ing from the standard pruning dates of mid and late dormancy to the bud swell stage. In contrast, the number of inflorescences in compound buds was significantly reduced for vines pruned in early May. No inflorescences were retained on vines pruned at the beginning of June. Early May pruning reduced fruit set and berry weight and slowed fruit ripening compared to the other pruning dates. At harvest, must soluble solids and titratable acidity were 1.6 Brix lower and 1.8 g/L higher, respectively, for the May treatment compared to the standard pruning dates. The early May pruning dates also achieved higher total anthocyanins and phenolic concentrations than the standard pruning dates, indicating that this technique can potentially decouple the accumulation dynamics of these components. Further studies are needed to better calibrate winter pruning date for managing yield and berry maturation rate.

Postbudburst spur pruning reduces yield and delays fruit sugar accumulation in sangiovese in central Italy / Frioni, Tommaso; Tombesi, Sergio; Silvestroni, Oriana; Lanari, Vania; Bellincontro, Andrea; Sabbatini, Paolo; Gatti, Matteo; Poni, Stefano; Palliotti, Alberto. - In: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ENOLOGY AND VITICULTURE. - ISSN 0002-9254. - STAMPA. - 67:4(2016), pp. 419-425. [10.5344/ajev.2016.15120]

Postbudburst spur pruning reduces yield and delays fruit sugar accumulation in sangiovese in central Italy

SILVESTRONI, Oriana;LANARI, VANIA;
2016-01-01

Abstract

The influence of pruning date on yield control and ripening rate of spur-pruned Sangiovese grapevines was investigated over two years (2013 and 2014). Winter pruning was applied on 1 or 4 Feb (mid dormancy); 1 or 5 March (late dormancy); 2 or 7 April (bud swell); 2 or 7 May (flowers closely pressed together); and 1 or 6 June (40 to 50% of flower caps fallen), respectively. Vine yield and fruit composition at harvest were not affected by shift­ing from the standard pruning dates of mid and late dormancy to the bud swell stage. In contrast, the number of inflorescences in compound buds was significantly reduced for vines pruned in early May. No inflorescences were retained on vines pruned at the beginning of June. Early May pruning reduced fruit set and berry weight and slowed fruit ripening compared to the other pruning dates. At harvest, must soluble solids and titratable acidity were 1.6 Brix lower and 1.8 g/L higher, respectively, for the May treatment compared to the standard pruning dates. The early May pruning dates also achieved higher total anthocyanins and phenolic concentrations than the standard pruning dates, indicating that this technique can potentially decouple the accumulation dynamics of these components. Further studies are needed to better calibrate winter pruning date for managing yield and berry maturation rate.
2016
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/248048
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 48
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 46
social impact