Inflammatory neovascular membrane

Purpose To describe the most common mistakes in the management of inflammatory choroidal neovascularization (CNV).Methods The current literature is reviewed and the experience of a tertiary referral centre is reported.Results CNV is a potentially sight-threatening sequela of uveitis. Several mistakes can be done during patients examination: CNV might not be recognized both at biomicroscopy and at fluorescein angiography (FA), for instance. Moreover, since some doctors are not aware of the importance of Indocyanine Green Angiography (ICGA), the choroidal involvement during inflammatory CNV might not be appreciated. These are just some examples of possible errors which can be done during the daily practice. The outcome of subfoveal CNV is poor if untreated: several procedures have been considered, even though there is lack of guidelines. The most important mistake can be represented by the lack of criticism on the treatment techniques: several methods have been proposed, albeit some of them should not be used on the basis of the treatment rationale and on the better knowledge of CNV pathophysiology. The presentation shows the most typical cases where the above mentioned mistakes have been done, suggesting some methods in order to avoid them.Conclusion CNV secondary to uveitis is a severe sequela, which can lead to significant visual impairment. Several mistakes can be done during both the diagnosis and the therapeutic procedures. Although no guideline is provided, the current medical literature can give the basis for a successful treatment strategy.