Objective: Estimating the impact of sonographically identified multiple or large (≥5 cm in diameter) fibroids on obstetric outcomes. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 219 women with uterine fibroids (identified on a routine second-trimester ultrasound survey over a 3-year period, 2010-2012) and their age-matched controls. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancy, delivery at >24 weeks of gestation and no pathological conditions (chronic hypertension, gestational diabetes or pre-existing diabetes mellitus, uterine anomalies or fetal malformations). Results: Compared to women with no fibroids, women with multiple fibroids (n = 34) had a significantly higher rate of preterm birth (29.4% versus 5%, p < 0.001), cesarean section (73.5% versus 37%, p < 0.001) and breech presentation (11.8% versus 2.7%, p = 0.04). Women with large fibroids (n = 48) had a higher rate of preterm birth (16.7% versus 5%, p = 0.01) and pPROM (10.4% versus 0.5%, p < 0.001). By multivariate analysis, only multiple fibroids and previous preterm birth showed an independent significant association with preterm birth (OR = 7.37, 95% CI 2.50-21.68 and OR = 13.01, 95% CI 3.56-47.52, respectively). Conclusions: Women with uterine fibroids are at an increased risk of obstetric complications. In particular, multiple rather than large fibroids are associated with a significantly increased risk of preterm birth and cesarean delivery while large fibroids are associated with a higher risk of pPROM. No correlation with IUGR, placenta previa or placental abruption was found.

Number and size of uterine fibroids and obstetric outcomes / Ciavattini, Andrea; Clemente, Nicolo'; DELLI CARPINI, Giovanni; DI GIUSEPPE, Jacopo; Giannubilo, Stefano Raffaele; Tranquilli, Andrea Luigi. - In: THE JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 1476-7058. - STAMPA. - 5:4(2015), pp. 1-5. [10.3109/14767058.2014.921675]

Number and size of uterine fibroids and obstetric outcomes.

CIAVATTINI, Andrea;CLEMENTE, NICOLO';DELLI CARPINI, GIOVANNI;DI GIUSEPPE, JACOPO;GIANNUBILO, Stefano Raffaele;TRANQUILLI, Andrea Luigi
2015-01-01

Abstract

Objective: Estimating the impact of sonographically identified multiple or large (≥5 cm in diameter) fibroids on obstetric outcomes. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 219 women with uterine fibroids (identified on a routine second-trimester ultrasound survey over a 3-year period, 2010-2012) and their age-matched controls. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancy, delivery at >24 weeks of gestation and no pathological conditions (chronic hypertension, gestational diabetes or pre-existing diabetes mellitus, uterine anomalies or fetal malformations). Results: Compared to women with no fibroids, women with multiple fibroids (n = 34) had a significantly higher rate of preterm birth (29.4% versus 5%, p < 0.001), cesarean section (73.5% versus 37%, p < 0.001) and breech presentation (11.8% versus 2.7%, p = 0.04). Women with large fibroids (n = 48) had a higher rate of preterm birth (16.7% versus 5%, p = 0.01) and pPROM (10.4% versus 0.5%, p < 0.001). By multivariate analysis, only multiple fibroids and previous preterm birth showed an independent significant association with preterm birth (OR = 7.37, 95% CI 2.50-21.68 and OR = 13.01, 95% CI 3.56-47.52, respectively). Conclusions: Women with uterine fibroids are at an increased risk of obstetric complications. In particular, multiple rather than large fibroids are associated with a significantly increased risk of preterm birth and cesarean delivery while large fibroids are associated with a higher risk of pPROM. No correlation with IUGR, placenta previa or placental abruption was found.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/205931
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 23
  • Scopus 84
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 66
social impact