The study compares official spectrophotometric methods for the determination of proline content in honey – those of the International Honey Commission (IHC) and the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) – with the original Ough method. Results show that the extra time-consuming treatment stages added by the IHC method with respect to the Ough method are pointless. We demonstrate that the AOACs method proves to be the best in terms of accuracy and time saving. The optimized waiting time for the absorbance recording is set at 35 min from the removal of reaction tubes from the boiling bath used in the sample treatment. The optimized method was validated in the matrix: linearity up to 1800 mg L-1, limit of detection 20 mg L-1 , limit of quantification 61 mg L-1. The method was applied to 43 unifloral honey samples from the Marche region, Italy.

Determination of proline in honey: Comparison between official methods, optimization and validation of the analytical methodology / Truzzi, Cristina; Annibaldi, Anna; Illuminati, Silvia; Finale, Carolina; Scarponi, Giuseppe. - In: FOOD CHEMISTRY. - ISSN 1873-7072. - 150:(2014), pp. 477-481.

Determination of proline in honey: Comparison between official methods, optimization and validation of the analytical methodology

TRUZZI, Cristina;ANNIBALDI, ANNA;ILLUMINATI, Silvia;FINALE, CAROLINA;SCARPONI, Giuseppe
2014-01-01

Abstract

The study compares official spectrophotometric methods for the determination of proline content in honey – those of the International Honey Commission (IHC) and the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) – with the original Ough method. Results show that the extra time-consuming treatment stages added by the IHC method with respect to the Ough method are pointless. We demonstrate that the AOACs method proves to be the best in terms of accuracy and time saving. The optimized waiting time for the absorbance recording is set at 35 min from the removal of reaction tubes from the boiling bath used in the sample treatment. The optimized method was validated in the matrix: linearity up to 1800 mg L-1, limit of detection 20 mg L-1 , limit of quantification 61 mg L-1. The method was applied to 43 unifloral honey samples from the Marche region, Italy.
2014
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/153110
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 49
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 44
social impact