Abstract This paper presents a comparison among available structural analysis formulations for composite beams with partial shear interaction. In the comparison all material are assumed to behave in a linear-elastic fashion. The formulations considered are the finite difference method, the finite element method, the direct stiffness method and the exact analytical model. The former two require a spatial discretisation to be specified along the beam length, while the latter two do not require any discretisation. Using the solution of the exact analytical model as a reference the accuracy of the three formulations has been tested for the cases of a simply supported beam and of a propped cantilever subjected to a uniformly distributed load. The comparison is carried out at various level of shear connection stiffness.
Partial interaction analysis of composite beams by means of the finite difference method, the finite element method, the direct stiffness method and the analytical solution: a comparative study / G., Ranzi; M. A., Bradford; Gara, Fabrizio; G., Leoni. - paper 189:(2004). (Intervento presentato al convegno 7th Int. Conf. on Computational Structures Technology, CST’04 tenutosi a Lisbon, Portugal nel 7-9 September 2004).
Partial interaction analysis of composite beams by means of the finite difference method, the finite element method, the direct stiffness method and the analytical solution: a comparative study
GARA, Fabrizio;
2004-01-01
Abstract
Abstract This paper presents a comparison among available structural analysis formulations for composite beams with partial shear interaction. In the comparison all material are assumed to behave in a linear-elastic fashion. The formulations considered are the finite difference method, the finite element method, the direct stiffness method and the exact analytical model. The former two require a spatial discretisation to be specified along the beam length, while the latter two do not require any discretisation. Using the solution of the exact analytical model as a reference the accuracy of the three formulations has been tested for the cases of a simply supported beam and of a propped cantilever subjected to a uniformly distributed load. The comparison is carried out at various level of shear connection stiffness.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
