CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System
IRIS è la soluzione IT che facilita la raccolta e la gestione dei dati relativi alle attività e ai prodotti della ricerca. Fornisce a ricercatori, amministratori e valutatori gli strumenti per monitorare i risultati della ricerca, aumentarne la visibilità e allocare in modo efficace le risorse disponibili.
EnglishAbstract This paper presents a comparison among available structural analysis formulations for composite beams with partial shear interaction. In the comparison all material are assumed to behave in a linear-elastic fashion. The formulations considered are the finite difference method, the finite element method, the direct stiffness method and the exact analytical model. The former two require a spatial discretisation to be specified along the beam length, while the latter two do not require any discretisation. Using the solution of the exact analytical model as a reference the accuracy of the three formulations has been tested for the cases of a simply supported beam and of a propped cantilever subjected to a uniformly distributed load. The comparison is carried out at various level of shear connection stiffness.
| Titolo: | Partial interaction analysis of composite beams by means of the finite difference method, the finite element method, the direct stiffness method and the analytical solution: a comparative study | |
| Autori: | ||
| Data di pubblicazione: | 2004 | |
| Abstract: | Abstract This paper presents a comparison among available structural analysis formulations for composite beams with partial shear interaction. In the comparison all material are assumed to behave in a linear-elastic fashion. The formulations considered are the finite difference method, the finite element method, the direct stiffness method and the exact analytical model. The former two require a spatial discretisation to be specified along the beam length, while the latter two do not require any discretisation. Using the solution of the exact analytical model as a reference the accuracy of the three formulations has been tested for the cases of a simply supported beam and of a propped cantilever subjected to a uniformly distributed load. The comparison is carried out at various level of shear connection stiffness. | |
| Handle: | http://hdl.handle.net/11566/47768 | |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | 4.1 Contributo in Atti di convegno |
File in questo prodotto:
Copyright © 2021