The paper examines the right to be heard in proceedings affecting person al liberty, with particular reference to compulsory medical treatment. From a procedural guarantee, it emerges as a requirement of substantive constitu tional legitimacy. The analysis reconstructs its relationship with informed consent, overcoming the dichotomy between self-determination and protec tion. The right to be heard thus becomes the decisive criterion for assessing the constitutional compatibility of digital technologies and artificial intelli gence.
II diritto all 'ascolto nei procedimenti a contenuto personale / De Angelis, M.. - (2025), pp. 247-277.
II diritto all 'ascolto nei procedimenti a contenuto personale.
De Angelis Monica
2025-01-01
Abstract
The paper examines the right to be heard in proceedings affecting person al liberty, with particular reference to compulsory medical treatment. From a procedural guarantee, it emerges as a requirement of substantive constitu tional legitimacy. The analysis reconstructs its relationship with informed consent, overcoming the dichotomy between self-determination and protec tion. The right to be heard thus becomes the decisive criterion for assessing the constitutional compatibility of digital technologies and artificial intelli gence.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
