This paper examines how women’s economic empowerment within households affects financial portfolio choices. Using data from the Bank of Italy’s Survey on Household Income and Wealth for 2004–2020, we measure empowerment via the female income share and examine its association with participation in risky assets and the share of financial wealth invested in equities and private bonds. The results show that a higher female income share is, on average, associated with lower exposure to risky assets. However, this aggregate effect conceals a key asymmetry: in male-headed households, a greater female income share reduces risky investment, whereas in female-headed households it increases it. Tests based on imputed individual risk preferences provide little support for a bargaining model in which income shares reweight partners’ risk attitudes. Instead, the evidence supports a unitary decision-making framework à la Becker, in which the identity and confidence of the household financial decision-maker are central. Financial-sector employment of the household head substantially attenuates these effects, whereas similarity in partners’ risk preferences does not, pointing to self-confidence rather than altruistic preference aggregation as the primary mechanism underlying household portfolio choices.

Household gender disparity and portfolio choices / Bettin, G., Sarno, E., Uddin Md, T., Zazzaro, A.. - ELETTRONICO. - (2024), pp. 138-169.

Household gender disparity and portfolio choices

Bettin Giulia;
2024-01-01

Abstract

This paper examines how women’s economic empowerment within households affects financial portfolio choices. Using data from the Bank of Italy’s Survey on Household Income and Wealth for 2004–2020, we measure empowerment via the female income share and examine its association with participation in risky assets and the share of financial wealth invested in equities and private bonds. The results show that a higher female income share is, on average, associated with lower exposure to risky assets. However, this aggregate effect conceals a key asymmetry: in male-headed households, a greater female income share reduces risky investment, whereas in female-headed households it increases it. Tests based on imputed individual risk preferences provide little support for a bargaining model in which income shares reweight partners’ risk attitudes. Instead, the evidence supports a unitary decision-making framework à la Becker, in which the identity and confidence of the household financial decision-maker are central. Financial-sector employment of the household head substantially attenuates these effects, whereas similarity in partners’ risk preferences does not, pointing to self-confidence rather than altruistic preference aggregation as the primary mechanism underlying household portfolio choices.
2024
Annals of CRISEI 2024. Sources of Inequality and Public Policies. Social Conflicts, Insurance and Labour Markets
978-88-98279-15-9
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Annals_2024_new-1.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza d'uso: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 1.94 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.94 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/363372
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact