This paper provides a critical analysis of the energy transition in Italy, examining whether current decarbonization policies serve a collective benefit or function as a regressive resource redistribution mechanism. The study highlights how the technical architecture of the Italian energy market allows renewable energy producers to capture significant rents by pegging prices to expensive natural gas. This pricing inefficiency shifts the financial burden of the transition onto households and firms through system charges on electricity bills, triggering a risk of energy poverty. The analysis further explores how the push for renewables has created a lucrative speculative market, attracting opaque interests and facilitating "green grabbing" practices. It notes that major fossil fuel producers often utilize these schemes to offset their emissions through carbon credits without altering their core production models. Additionally, the paper critiques the lack of scientific rigor in assessing the productivity of industrial-scale plants in regions like Sardinia. Finally, referring to a game theory framework, unilateral decarbonization efforts by individual blocs like the EU risk imposing domestic sacrifices without achieving a tangible global impact, given the lack of international cooperation from other major CO2 emitters. The paper concludes that a fundamental redesign of the subsidy and pricing framework is essential to ensure a "just transition" that prioritizes social equity and scientific accuracy.
The energy transition: is decarbonization driving a redistribution of resources? / Bosco, M.G.. - ELETTRONICO. - (2026), pp. 10-17.
The energy transition: is decarbonization driving a redistribution of resources?
Bosco, Maria Giovanna
Primo
2026-01-01
Abstract
This paper provides a critical analysis of the energy transition in Italy, examining whether current decarbonization policies serve a collective benefit or function as a regressive resource redistribution mechanism. The study highlights how the technical architecture of the Italian energy market allows renewable energy producers to capture significant rents by pegging prices to expensive natural gas. This pricing inefficiency shifts the financial burden of the transition onto households and firms through system charges on electricity bills, triggering a risk of energy poverty. The analysis further explores how the push for renewables has created a lucrative speculative market, attracting opaque interests and facilitating "green grabbing" practices. It notes that major fossil fuel producers often utilize these schemes to offset their emissions through carbon credits without altering their core production models. Additionally, the paper critiques the lack of scientific rigor in assessing the productivity of industrial-scale plants in regions like Sardinia. Finally, referring to a game theory framework, unilateral decarbonization efforts by individual blocs like the EU risk imposing domestic sacrifices without achieving a tangible global impact, given the lack of international cooperation from other major CO2 emitters. The paper concludes that a fundamental redesign of the subsidy and pricing framework is essential to ensure a "just transition" that prioritizes social equity and scientific accuracy.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
INEQBook2026.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Documento in post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza d'uso:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
1.3 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.3 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


