The orientation of a part during manufacturing is a crucial variable that must be considered in product design to leverage the advantages of additive manufacturing (AM). Various methods for determining the optimal print direction have been proposed in the scientific literature, each based on different evaluation criteria. However, most existing studies focus on specific AM technologies and lack a comprehensive approach that incorporates multiple criteria. Additionally, these methods often require designers to assign weights to highly technical parameters, which can be difficult, particularly in the early stages of design. In contrast, designers are typically more comfortable with broader criteria such as cost-effectiveness, productivity, quality, mechanical strength, and environmental sustainability. This paper introduces a multi-criteria decision-making method to optimize part orientation in AM. The proposed approach evaluates six high-level decision criteria—cost-effectiveness, rapidity, productivity, quality, mechanical strength, and environmental sustainability—along with nineteen detailed technical sub-criteria. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method prioritizes the high-level criteria. Instead, the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) determines the optimal build orientation.

A Method to Optimize the Part Build Orientation in Additive Manufacturing / Mandolini, M., Chiacchietta, C., Marconi, M., Favi, C., Sidoli, F., Gallozzi, S., Sartini, M.. - (2026), pp. 153-158. (12th International Conference on Sustainable Design and Manufacturing (KES-SDM 2025) Catania 17 - 19 September 2025) [10.1007/978-3-032-21469-0_16].

A Method to Optimize the Part Build Orientation in Additive Manufacturing

Mandolini, Marco
Primo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Gallozzi, Simone
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Sartini, Mikhailo
Ultimo
Methodology
2026-01-01

Abstract

The orientation of a part during manufacturing is a crucial variable that must be considered in product design to leverage the advantages of additive manufacturing (AM). Various methods for determining the optimal print direction have been proposed in the scientific literature, each based on different evaluation criteria. However, most existing studies focus on specific AM technologies and lack a comprehensive approach that incorporates multiple criteria. Additionally, these methods often require designers to assign weights to highly technical parameters, which can be difficult, particularly in the early stages of design. In contrast, designers are typically more comfortable with broader criteria such as cost-effectiveness, productivity, quality, mechanical strength, and environmental sustainability. This paper introduces a multi-criteria decision-making method to optimize part orientation in AM. The proposed approach evaluates six high-level decision criteria—cost-effectiveness, rapidity, productivity, quality, mechanical strength, and environmental sustainability—along with nineteen detailed technical sub-criteria. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method prioritizes the high-level criteria. Instead, the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) determines the optimal build orientation.
2026
9783032214683
9783032214690
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Mandolini_Method-Optimize-Part-Build_2026.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza d'uso: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 305.35 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
305.35 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
KES_2025 - short Paper - Clean.pdf

embargo fino al 03/06/2027

Tipologia: Documento in post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza d'uso: Licenza specifica dell'editore
Dimensione 256.58 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
256.58 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/360512
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact