This paper presents a comparison between two types of controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) decentralised systems in school classrooms: one with an internal unit within the classroom (I), and one with ducts located in the ceiling (C). The main results show that, in terms of indoor air quality evaluation, CO2 levels in classrooms are influenced by both the opening or closing of doors and windows, as well as by the mechanical ventilation system. Only the classroom with the ceiling-hosted system (C) maintains acceptable CO2 levels solely through the system’s contribution, without the need to open the windows. The three-dimensional comfort mapping demonstrates a uniform microclimatic condition in the C classroom, while the I classroom records localised discomfort.

Mechanical Ventilation and Indoor Environmental Quality: Experimental Comparison Between Two Decentralised Systems in School Classrooms / Summa, Serena; Cippitelli, Margherita; Di Perna, Costanzo; Stazi, Francesca. - (2025). ( 12th International Conference of Ar.Tec. (Scientific Society of Architectural Engineering), Colloqui.AT.e 2025 Trento 11 - 14 June 2025) [10.1007/978-3-032-06978-8_40].

Mechanical Ventilation and Indoor Environmental Quality: Experimental Comparison Between Two Decentralised Systems in School Classrooms

Serena Summa
Primo
Formal Analysis
;
Margherita Cippitelli
Secondo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Costanzo Di Perna
Penultimo
Supervision
;
Francesca Stazi
Ultimo
Supervision
2025-01-01

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison between two types of controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) decentralised systems in school classrooms: one with an internal unit within the classroom (I), and one with ducts located in the ceiling (C). The main results show that, in terms of indoor air quality evaluation, CO2 levels in classrooms are influenced by both the opening or closing of doors and windows, as well as by the mechanical ventilation system. Only the classroom with the ceiling-hosted system (C) maintains acceptable CO2 levels solely through the system’s contribution, without the need to open the windows. The three-dimensional comfort mapping demonstrates a uniform microclimatic condition in the C classroom, while the I classroom records localised discomfort.
2025
978-3-032-06977-1
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ColloquiATe2025_final version (1).pdf

embargo fino al 29/10/2026

Descrizione: articolo
Tipologia: Documento in post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza d'uso: Licenza specifica dell'editore
Dimensione 1.64 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.64 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/349492
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact