Accurate assessment of pancreatic beta-cell function parameters, such as glucose sensitivity (G-Sens), rate sensitivity (R-Sens), and potentiation factor ratio (PFR), relies on mathematical modelling coupled with C-peptide measurement, both not always accessible in clinical settings. Machine learning may provide surrogate markers of model-and-C-peptide-based parameters. Aim of the study was to leverage machine learning to build predictive equations of G-Sens, R-Sens, and PFR in pregnant women, without the need of modeling and C-peptide. To this aim, predictive approaches were implemented (multivariate polynomial regressions), under different scenarios of data availability. We found that G-Sens prediction showed good performance (R-adj(2) = 0.45, p<0.0001 in test set), whereas results were unsatisfactory for R-Sens. PFR prediction showed moderate performance (R-adj(2) = 0.33, p < 0.01 in test set). In conclusion, machine learning is appropriate for G-Sens and PFR prediction, while R-Sens prediction appears hardly feasible.
Machine Learning-Based Indices Assessing Different Aspects of Beta-Cell Function in Pregnancy / Salvatori, B; Piersanti, A; Linder, T; Eppe, D; Morettini, M; Gob, C; Tura, A. - ELETTRONICO. - 109:(2024), pp. 622-630. ( 11th International Conference on E-Health and Bioengineering (EHB) Univ Med & Pharmacy Iasi, Fac Med Bioengn, Bucharest, ROMANIA 09-10 november 2023) [10.1007/978-3-031-62502-2_70].
Machine Learning-Based Indices Assessing Different Aspects of Beta-Cell Function in Pregnancy
Morettini, M;
2024-01-01
Abstract
Accurate assessment of pancreatic beta-cell function parameters, such as glucose sensitivity (G-Sens), rate sensitivity (R-Sens), and potentiation factor ratio (PFR), relies on mathematical modelling coupled with C-peptide measurement, both not always accessible in clinical settings. Machine learning may provide surrogate markers of model-and-C-peptide-based parameters. Aim of the study was to leverage machine learning to build predictive equations of G-Sens, R-Sens, and PFR in pregnant women, without the need of modeling and C-peptide. To this aim, predictive approaches were implemented (multivariate polynomial regressions), under different scenarios of data availability. We found that G-Sens prediction showed good performance (R-adj(2) = 0.45, p<0.0001 in test set), whereas results were unsatisfactory for R-Sens. PFR prediction showed moderate performance (R-adj(2) = 0.33, p < 0.01 in test set). In conclusion, machine learning is appropriate for G-Sens and PFR prediction, while R-Sens prediction appears hardly feasible.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Salvatori_Machine-Learning-Based-Indices_2023.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza d'uso:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
592.1 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
592.1 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


