The paper concerns the comparison between reverberation chamber measurements (RC) and anechoic chamber (AC) measurements: in particular, the case of an immunity test is considered. A two-wire transmission line is adopted as a device under test (DUT), and the current induced on the line by the external field is monitored to construct a possible susceptibility profile. Both the averaged current, over the stirrer rotation, and the maximum current are considered to show how robust is the RC measurement against the positioning and the orientation of the DUT inside the chamber. As expected from theory, the maximum value is related to the average one by means of the number of the independent position of the stirrer. Finally, it is highlighted how in RC it is possible to lost some worst case situations, related to a particular incident field polarization and incoming direction, and the underestimation of the induced current depends upon the chosen number of the stirrer positions

Radiated Immunity Tests: Reverberation Chamber vs. Anechoic Chamber Results / DE LEO, Roberto; MARIANI PRIMIANI, Valter. - (2005), pp. 337-341. (Intervento presentato al convegno IMTC05 tenutosi a Ottawa - CANADA nel May, 17-19) [10.1109/IMTC.2005.1604130].

Radiated Immunity Tests: Reverberation Chamber vs. Anechoic Chamber Results

DE LEO, Roberto;MARIANI PRIMIANI, Valter
2005-01-01

Abstract

The paper concerns the comparison between reverberation chamber measurements (RC) and anechoic chamber (AC) measurements: in particular, the case of an immunity test is considered. A two-wire transmission line is adopted as a device under test (DUT), and the current induced on the line by the external field is monitored to construct a possible susceptibility profile. Both the averaged current, over the stirrer rotation, and the maximum current are considered to show how robust is the RC measurement against the positioning and the orientation of the DUT inside the chamber. As expected from theory, the maximum value is related to the average one by means of the number of the independent position of the stirrer. Finally, it is highlighted how in RC it is possible to lost some worst case situations, related to a particular incident field polarization and incoming direction, and the underestimation of the induced current depends upon the chosen number of the stirrer positions
2005
9780780388796
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/47487
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact