Introduction: A prospective survey to evaluate the diagnostic workup of cystic pancreatic neoplasms (CPNs) according to the Italian guidelines. Methods: An online data sheet was built. Results: Fifteen of the 1385 patients (1.1%) had non cystic neoplastic lesions. Forty percent (518/1295) had at least one 1st degree relative affected by a solid tumor of the digestive and extra-digestive organs. Symptoms/signs associated with the cystic lesion were present in 24.5% of the patients. The cysts were localized in the head of the pancreas in 38.5% of patients. Of the 2370 examinations (1.7 examinations per patient) which were carried out for the diagnosis, magnetic resonance imaging was performed as a single test in 48.4% of patients and in combination with endoscopic ultrasound in 27% of the cases. Of the 1370 patients having CPNs, 89.9% had an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) (70.1% a branch duct IPMN, 6.2% a mixed type IPMN and 4.6% a main duct IPMN), 12.7% had a serous cystadenoma, 2.8% a mucinous cystadenoma, 1.5% a non-functioning cystic neuroendocrine neoplasm, 0.7% a solid-pseudopapillary cystic neoplasm, 0.3% a cystic adenocarcinoma, and 1.2% an undetermined cystic neoplasm. Seventy-eight (5.7%) patients were operated upon after the initial work-up. Conclusions: This prospective study offers a reliable real-life picture of the diagnostic work-up CPN.

Epidemiology, clinical features and diagnostic work-up of cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: Interim analysis of the prospective PANCY survey / Pezzilli, R.; Buscarini, E.; Pollini, T.; Bonamini, D.; Marchegiani, G.; Crippa, S.; Belfiori, G.; Sperti, C.; Moletta, L.; Pozza, G.; De Nucci, G.; Manes, G.; Mandelli, E. D.; Casadei, R.; Ricci, C.; Alicante, S.; Vattiato, C.; Carrara, S.; Di Leo, M.; Fabbri, C.; Giovanelli, S.; Barresi, L.; Tacelli, M.; Mirante, V. G.; Conigliaro, R.; Antonini, F.; Macarri, G.; Frulloni, L.; De Marchi, G.; Sassatelli, R.; Cecinato, P.; Del Vecchio Blanco, G.; Galli, A.; Pezzullo, A.; Fantin, A.; Graffeo, M.; Frego, M.; Stillittano, D.; Monica, F.; Germana, B.; Capurso, G.; Quartini, M.; Veneroni, L.; Cannizzaro, R.; Falconi, M.. - In: DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE. - ISSN 1590-8658. - 52:5(2020), pp. 547-554. [10.1016/j.dld.2020.02.003]

Epidemiology, clinical features and diagnostic work-up of cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: Interim analysis of the prospective PANCY survey

Marchegiani G.;Belfiori G.;Macarri G.;Galli A.;
2020-01-01

Abstract

Introduction: A prospective survey to evaluate the diagnostic workup of cystic pancreatic neoplasms (CPNs) according to the Italian guidelines. Methods: An online data sheet was built. Results: Fifteen of the 1385 patients (1.1%) had non cystic neoplastic lesions. Forty percent (518/1295) had at least one 1st degree relative affected by a solid tumor of the digestive and extra-digestive organs. Symptoms/signs associated with the cystic lesion were present in 24.5% of the patients. The cysts were localized in the head of the pancreas in 38.5% of patients. Of the 2370 examinations (1.7 examinations per patient) which were carried out for the diagnosis, magnetic resonance imaging was performed as a single test in 48.4% of patients and in combination with endoscopic ultrasound in 27% of the cases. Of the 1370 patients having CPNs, 89.9% had an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) (70.1% a branch duct IPMN, 6.2% a mixed type IPMN and 4.6% a main duct IPMN), 12.7% had a serous cystadenoma, 2.8% a mucinous cystadenoma, 1.5% a non-functioning cystic neuroendocrine neoplasm, 0.7% a solid-pseudopapillary cystic neoplasm, 0.3% a cystic adenocarcinoma, and 1.2% an undetermined cystic neoplasm. Seventy-eight (5.7%) patients were operated upon after the initial work-up. Conclusions: This prospective study offers a reliable real-life picture of the diagnostic work-up CPN.
2020
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11566/290073
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 9
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact